Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite
Fonseca, P., Olabarrieta Landa, L., Panyavin, I., Ortiz Jiménez, X. A., Aguayo Arelis, A., Rabago Barajas, B. V., Rodriguez Agudelo, Y., & Arango Lasprilla, J. C. (2016). Perceived ethical misconduct: a survey of neuropsychology professionals in Mexico. International Journal of Psychological Research, 9(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.2101
License terms
The work that is sent to this journal must be original, not published or sent to be published elsewhere; and if it is accepted for publication, authors will agree to transfer copyright to International Journal of Psychological Research. 

To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate. 

The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the frequency of perceived ethical misconduct in the practice of neuropsychology in Mexico. Method: One hundred fourteen psychologists answered a survey which assessed perceptions of ethical misconduct in four areas of professional practice in the field of neuropsychology.Results: The area of professional training contained the highest percentage of perception of ethical misconduct, followed by research and publications, clinical care, and professional relationships. Conclusion: The high frequency of ethical misconduct perceived by neuropsychology professionals in Mexico is a cause for concern. The results suggest the need to create and implement a system to make sure that professionals follow the ethics standards required by the profession, and to provide consequences for those who fail to do so. The profession of neuropsychology and training of professionals in the field must be regularized in the country, to reduce the frequency of future ethical misconducts.

Keywords:

References

American Psychological Association. (2010). Clinical Neuropsychology. Recuperado de http://www.apa.org/ed/graduate/specialize/neuro.aspx
Benton, A. (2000). Exploring the history of neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lago, M. R., & de Noreña, D. (2007). El papel del neuropsicólogo. Acción Psicológica, 4(3), 9-15.
Ostrosky-Solís, F., & Matute, E. (2009). La neuropsicología en México. Revista Neuropsicología, Neuropsiquiatría y Neurociencias, 9(2), 85-98.
Mexican Psychological Society. (2007). Código ético del psicólogo. México: Trillas.
Stark, M., Frels, R., Reyes, R. & Sharma, B. (2010). The Practice of psychotherapy in Mexico: Past and present. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 38, 27-38.
Ubis, J. I. Q. & Odriozola, E. E. (2008). Funciones y formación del neuropsicólogo clínico: Una propuesta. Papeles del Psicólogo, 29(3), 301-306.
Villa, M.A. (2008). ¿Qué es y qué no es la neuropsicología? Revista Mexicana de Neurociencia, 9(3), 227-230.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Cited by