PDF
FLIP
Cómo citar
Martínez Coral, P. (2015). Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político*. Criterios, 8(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.21500/20115733.2207
Más formatos de cita
Resumen
El presente artículo expone dos contribuciones teóricas del institucionalismo
histórico a la ciencia política que, a diferencia de los
estudios más representativos que ha orientado esta corriente de pensamiento en la disciplina, se centran en el ámbito del análisis político antes que en la reconstrucción de macrodinámicas de cambio institucional.
La primera de ellas corresponde al esclarecimiento conceptual
de la capacidad que tienen los instrumentos de acción pública para estructurar el contenido sustancial de la política, la incidencia que tienen en la representación de los problemas públicos, y el rol que ejercen sobre la formación y/o transmisión de preferencias. La segunda se refiere a las implicaciones de la dimensión temporal de las políticas, con base en la cual es posible controvertir gran parte de las aproximaciones convencionales de la disciplina en torno a los procesos de aprendizaje.
Citas
Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. MA:
Addison-Wesley.
Arthur, B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
Arthur, B. (1992). On learning and adaptation in the economy. Queen´s Economics Department,
Working Paper N.o
854.
Bachrach, P. & Baratz, M. (1962). Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review,
56 (4): 947-952.
Barrados, M; & Mayne, J. (2003). Can Public Sector Organizations Learn? OECD Journal on
Budgeting, 3(3): 87-104.
Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R. C., & Vedung, E. O. (2007). Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons:
Policy instruments and their evaluation. New Jersey: Transaction.
Bennett, C. & Howlett, M. (1992). The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of policy
learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25: 275-294.
Berends, H; Boersma, K. & Weggeman, M. (2003). The Structuration of Organizational Leaning.
Human Relations, 56(9): 1035–56.
Blindenbacher, R. (2010). The Black Box of Governmental Learning: the Learning Spiral—a
Concept to Organize Learning in Governments. Washington: The World Bank.
Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and
other Economic Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVI: 75-111.
Capano, G. (2009). Understanding Policy Change as an Epistemological and Theoretical
Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice,
11 (1): 7-31.
Capoccia, G. & Kelemen, D. (2007). The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and
Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics, 59 (3): 341-369.
Chapman, J. (2004). System Failure. Why Governments Must Learn to Think Differently.
London: Demos.
Collier, R & Collier, D. (2002) Shaping the political arena. Critical junctures, the labor movement,
and regime dynamics in Latin America. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework:
From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–37.
David, P. (2000). Path Dependence, Its Critics and the Quest for ‘Historical Economics’.
Working Paper. Department of Economics Stanford University.
Grin, J & Loeber, A. (2007). Theories of Policy Learning: Agency, Structure, and Change. In:
Handbook of Public Policy Analysis, Theory, Politics, and Methods. Fischer, F; Miller,
G & Sidney, M. Eds. London: CRC Press. Pp. 201-2015.
Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the State: The case of economic policymaking
in Britain. In: Comparative Politics, 25 (3): 275-296.
Hall, P. & Taylor, R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Discussion
Paper No 96, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
Hay, C. & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies,
46 (5): 951-957.
Hood, C. (2007): Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the
Tools of Government after Two Decades. In: Governance: An International Journal of
Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (1): 127–144.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?. Public Administration, 69: 3-19.
Ikenberry, J. (1994). History´s heavy hand. Institutions and the politics of the state. Paper
Prepared for a Conference on “New perspectives on institutions” University of Maryland,
1st October 1994. Available: http://scholar.princeton.edu/gji3/files/HistorysHeavyHand.pdf
Immergut, E. (1998). The theoretical core of the New Institutionalism. Politics and society,
26 (1): 5-34.
Katznelson, I. & Weingast, B. Ed. (2005). Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection
Between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. New York: Russell Sage
Foundation.
Kerr, P. (2002). Saved from Extinction: Evolutionary Theorising, Politics and the State. British
Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4 (2): 330–358.
Kim, D. (1993). The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning, Management Review,
15: 37-50.
Lascoumes, P. & Le Galès, P. (2007). Understanding Public Policy through Its InstrumentsFrom
the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation,
Governance, 20 (1).
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Levinthal, D. & March, J. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal,
14 (Special Issue: Organizations, Decision Making and Strategy): 95-112.
Lindblom, Ch. (1959). The Science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review,
19 (2): 79-88.
Linder, S. & Peters, G. (1989). Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts. Journal
of Public Policy, 9 (01): 35-58.
Mahoney, J. (2001). Path-Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in
Comparative Perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36 (1):
111–141.
Page, S. (2008). Uncertainty, Difficulty, and Complexity. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 20: 115-149.
Page, S. (2005). An Essay on The Existence and Causes of Path Dependence. Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan.
Palier, B. (2007). Tracking the Evolution of a Single Instrument Can Reveal Profound Changes:
The Case of Funded Pensions in France. Governance: An International Journal of
Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (1): 85–107.
Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of the Royal Society Interface,
11 (98). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0378
Peters, G. (2000). Institutional Theory: Problems and Prospects. Political Science Series,
69. Vienna: Institute for advanced studies.
Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: explaining institutional origins and change. Governance:
An international journal of policy and administration, 13 (4): 475-499.
Pierson, P. (1993). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change,
World Politics, 45 (4): 595-628.
Pierson, P. & Skocpol, T. (2008). El institucionalismo histórico en la ciencia política contemporánea.
Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 17 (1): 7-38.
Sabatier, P. & Weible, C. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process, Cambridge: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. Ed. pp. 189-222.
Salamon, L. (2000). The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction.
Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28 (5): 1611-1674.
Schulz, M. (2001). Organizational Learning. En: Joel A. C. Baum (ed) Companion to Organizations.
Washington: Blackwell.
Steinmo, S. (2008). What is Historical Institutionalism?. In: Approaches in the Social Sciences,
Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating (Eds.). Cambridge UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political
Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tilly, C. (1995). To Explain Political Processes. American Journal of Sociology, 100 (6):
1594-1610.
Walker, W., Rahman, A., Adnan, S & Cave, J. (2001). Adaptive policies, policy analysis and
policymaking. European Journal of Operational Research, 128 (20), 282 – 289.
Young, P. (1996). The Economics of Convention. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (2):
105-122.
Zittoun, P. (2011). From Instrument to Policy: Observing the Meaning Process to Make a
Decision. Political Science Review, 48 (5): 106-124.
Addison-Wesley.
Arthur, B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
Arthur, B. (1992). On learning and adaptation in the economy. Queen´s Economics Department,
Working Paper N.o
854.
Bachrach, P. & Baratz, M. (1962). Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review,
56 (4): 947-952.
Barrados, M; & Mayne, J. (2003). Can Public Sector Organizations Learn? OECD Journal on
Budgeting, 3(3): 87-104.
Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R. C., & Vedung, E. O. (2007). Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons:
Policy instruments and their evaluation. New Jersey: Transaction.
Bennett, C. & Howlett, M. (1992). The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of policy
learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25: 275-294.
Berends, H; Boersma, K. & Weggeman, M. (2003). The Structuration of Organizational Leaning.
Human Relations, 56(9): 1035–56.
Blindenbacher, R. (2010). The Black Box of Governmental Learning: the Learning Spiral—a
Concept to Organize Learning in Governments. Washington: The World Bank.
Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and
other Economic Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVI: 75-111.
Capano, G. (2009). Understanding Policy Change as an Epistemological and Theoretical
Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice,
11 (1): 7-31.
Capoccia, G. & Kelemen, D. (2007). The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and
Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics, 59 (3): 341-369.
Chapman, J. (2004). System Failure. Why Governments Must Learn to Think Differently.
London: Demos.
Collier, R & Collier, D. (2002) Shaping the political arena. Critical junctures, the labor movement,
and regime dynamics in Latin America. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework:
From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–37.
David, P. (2000). Path Dependence, Its Critics and the Quest for ‘Historical Economics’.
Working Paper. Department of Economics Stanford University.
Grin, J & Loeber, A. (2007). Theories of Policy Learning: Agency, Structure, and Change. In:
Handbook of Public Policy Analysis, Theory, Politics, and Methods. Fischer, F; Miller,
G & Sidney, M. Eds. London: CRC Press. Pp. 201-2015.
Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the State: The case of economic policymaking
in Britain. In: Comparative Politics, 25 (3): 275-296.
Hall, P. & Taylor, R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Discussion
Paper No 96, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
Hay, C. & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies,
46 (5): 951-957.
Hood, C. (2007): Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the
Tools of Government after Two Decades. In: Governance: An International Journal of
Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (1): 127–144.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?. Public Administration, 69: 3-19.
Ikenberry, J. (1994). History´s heavy hand. Institutions and the politics of the state. Paper
Prepared for a Conference on “New perspectives on institutions” University of Maryland,
1st October 1994. Available: http://scholar.princeton.edu/gji3/files/HistorysHeavyHand.pdf
Immergut, E. (1998). The theoretical core of the New Institutionalism. Politics and society,
26 (1): 5-34.
Katznelson, I. & Weingast, B. Ed. (2005). Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection
Between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. New York: Russell Sage
Foundation.
Kerr, P. (2002). Saved from Extinction: Evolutionary Theorising, Politics and the State. British
Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4 (2): 330–358.
Kim, D. (1993). The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning, Management Review,
15: 37-50.
Lascoumes, P. & Le Galès, P. (2007). Understanding Public Policy through Its InstrumentsFrom
the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation,
Governance, 20 (1).
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Levinthal, D. & March, J. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal,
14 (Special Issue: Organizations, Decision Making and Strategy): 95-112.
Lindblom, Ch. (1959). The Science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review,
19 (2): 79-88.
Linder, S. & Peters, G. (1989). Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts. Journal
of Public Policy, 9 (01): 35-58.
Mahoney, J. (2001). Path-Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in
Comparative Perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36 (1):
111–141.
Page, S. (2008). Uncertainty, Difficulty, and Complexity. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 20: 115-149.
Page, S. (2005). An Essay on The Existence and Causes of Path Dependence. Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan.
Palier, B. (2007). Tracking the Evolution of a Single Instrument Can Reveal Profound Changes:
The Case of Funded Pensions in France. Governance: An International Journal of
Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (1): 85–107.
Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of the Royal Society Interface,
11 (98). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0378
Peters, G. (2000). Institutional Theory: Problems and Prospects. Political Science Series,
69. Vienna: Institute for advanced studies.
Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: explaining institutional origins and change. Governance:
An international journal of policy and administration, 13 (4): 475-499.
Pierson, P. (1993). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change,
World Politics, 45 (4): 595-628.
Pierson, P. & Skocpol, T. (2008). El institucionalismo histórico en la ciencia política contemporánea.
Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 17 (1): 7-38.
Sabatier, P. & Weible, C. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process, Cambridge: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. Ed. pp. 189-222.
Salamon, L. (2000). The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction.
Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28 (5): 1611-1674.
Schulz, M. (2001). Organizational Learning. En: Joel A. C. Baum (ed) Companion to Organizations.
Washington: Blackwell.
Steinmo, S. (2008). What is Historical Institutionalism?. In: Approaches in the Social Sciences,
Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating (Eds.). Cambridge UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political
Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tilly, C. (1995). To Explain Political Processes. American Journal of Sociology, 100 (6):
1594-1610.
Walker, W., Rahman, A., Adnan, S & Cave, J. (2001). Adaptive policies, policy analysis and
policymaking. European Journal of Operational Research, 128 (20), 282 – 289.
Young, P. (1996). The Economics of Convention. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (2):
105-122.
Zittoun, P. (2011). From Instrument to Policy: Observing the Meaning Process to Make a
Decision. Political Science Review, 48 (5): 106-124.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
