Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite
Almanza Loaiza, Tulia. 2013. “Memory of Experience As an Ethical Answer to the Victims”. Franciscanum 55 (160):17-50. https://doi.org/10.21500/01201468.829.
License terms

This journal provides immediate open access to its content, based on the principle that giving the public free access to research helps a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Therefore, the Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution Attribution - Equal Share (by-sa) License is accepted: The commercial use of the work and the possible derived works is permitted, the distribution of which must be done with a license equal to that regulates the original work.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Along these same lines and in line with the Open Access policy, it is clarified that the authors maintain their rights to articles, without restrictions and, in the same way, they maintain their publication rights, without restrictions. They are only asked to reference the number of the Franciscanum magazine where the article initially appeared.

Abstract

The departure point of this paper is the experience done by
those nations who suffered barbarian catastrophes that still require to be thought. In fact, memory of particular individuals who suffered brings often in contradiction the official history, so their stories should be taken into account in order to understand the contexts that produce war and such disasters. This is the reason why History has recently tried to make room to the experience of victims, the war survivors, and has defined itself more as an exercise of memory. Somehow, all humans have been affected by such violence and cannot escape from it by living in indifference. Adorno asks the survivors to assume what he calls the negative dialectics, that is the self-reflection of thought which «means thinking against himself». He interpreted the expression as the obligation to attend to the violence that was inflicted to all humanity in the particular individuals directly involved: the executioners and their victims. This paper reflects on the relation between ethics and reflection guided by Adorno’s philosophy and tries to answer the following question: How can an ethical proposal be derived from the encounter with the memory?

Keywords:

References

Adorno, Theodor. Consignas. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1973.

________. Dialéctica negativa. Madrid: Taurus, 1975.

________. Dialéctica negativa. La jerga de la autenticidad. Madrid: Akal, 2011.

________. Mínima moralia. Reflexiones desde la vida dañada. Madrid: Akal, 2006.

Chaparro, Adolfo. «Genealogía de la forma estado en Colombia». En Chaparro, Adolfo y Galindo, Carolina. Génesis y transformaciones del Estado nación en Colombia. Bogotá: Editorial Universidad El Rosario, 2009.

Garay, L.J. Barberi, F y Vargas, F. Análisis propositivo del proyecto de Ley de víctimas. Por el Cual se dictan medidas de atención y reparación integral a las víctimas por el Gobierno nacional en la Cámara de Representantes. Comisión de Seguimiento a la Política Pública sobre Desplazamiento forzado. Bogotá: Mímeo, 2010.

Honneth, Axel. La lucha por el reconocimiento. Barcelona: Crítica, 1996.

Horkheimer, Max y Adorno, Theodor. Dialéctica de la Ilustración. Fragmentos filosóficos. Madrid: Trotta, 1998.

Reyes Mate, Manuel. La razón de los vencidos. Barcelona: Anthropos, 2008.

________. Por los campos de exterminio. Barcelona: Anthropos, 2003.

________. «Primo Levi, el testigo. Una semblanza en el XX aniversario de su desaparición». En El perdón, virtud política. Barcelona: Anthropos, 2008.

________. Medianoche en la historia. Comentarios a las Tesis de Walter Benjamin «Sobre el concepto de historia». Madrid: Trotta, 2009.

Schweppenhäuser, Gerhard. Adorno’s Nachgelassene Schriften: Probleme der Moralphilosophie, editado por Thomas Schröder. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1996.

________. Ethik nach Auschwitz. Adorno’s Negative Moral Philosophie. Hamburg: Argument Verlag, 1993.

Tafalla, Martha. Theodor Adorno. Una filosofía de la memoria. Barcelona: Herder, 2003.

________. «Recordar para no repetir: El nuevo imperativo categórico de T.W. Adorno». En Mardones, J.M. y Reyes Mate, Manuel. La ética ante las víctimas. Barcelona: Anthropos, 2003.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Cited by