La filosofía y los nacidos. ¿Por qué los filósofos olvidaron el nacimiento?

Francisco Díez Fischer

doi:10.21500/01201468.851

Published: 2012-05-30

DOI: 10.21500/01201468.851

Philosophy and the born. Why philosophers forgot the birth?

Francisco Díez Fischer

Universidad Católica Argentina

View/Download

PDF (Español (España))

FLIP

Dimensions

PlumX

Doi

https://doi.org/10.21500/01201468.851

Issue: Vol. 54 No. 157 (2012)

How to Cite

Díez Fischer, Francisco. 2012. “Philosophy and the Born. Why Philosophers Forgot the Birth?”. Franciscanum 54 (157):307-29. https://doi.org/10.21500/01201468.851.

More Citation Formats

ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

License terms ▼

This journal provides immediate open access to its content, based on the principle that giving the public free access to research helps a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Therefore, the Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution Attribution - Equal Share (by-sa) License is accepted: The commercial use of the work and the possible derived works is permitted, the distribution of which must be done with a license equal to that regulates the original work.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Along these same lines and in line with the Open Access policy, it is clarified that the authors maintain their rights to articles, without restrictions and, in the same way, they maintain their publication rights, without restrictions. They are only asked to reference the number of the Franciscanum magazine where the article initially appeared.

Abstract

The birth is the primary event that originates men and will generate many bioethical issues. But the importance of its inaugural character contrasts with an apparent philosophical oblivion. It is strange that philosophers have preferred to meditate more about the being for death, than about its beginning, considering philosophy knowledge of origins. Some authors, as Stanislas Breton and Paul Ricoeur, have experimented their reasons about this tanatical inclination. This work wants to make philosophers worry about fields that are not native for them and lead the first steps in a march in the darkness that will search for questions. How far is it possible the philosophical learning of the nascent being?

Keywords:

Birth

heritage

conscience

beginning

language.

References

Diccionario de la Real Academia Española. Edición 22. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, 2001.

Arendt, H. La condición humana. Traducido por Ramón Gil Novales. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1993.

Borges, J. L. “El libro de arena”. En Obras Completas III. Barcelona: Emecé, 1996.

Breton, S. Causalité et projet. Paris: PUF, 2000.

Cioran, E. Del inconveniente de haber nacido. Traducido por Esther Seligson. Madrid: Taurus, 1981.

Martínez, G. Borges y la matemática. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 2005.

Mugica, H. Lo naciente. Pensar el acto creador. Madrid: Pretextos, 2007.

Ricoeur, P. Lo voluntario y lo involuntario. Vol. II. Traducido por Juan Carlos Gorlier. Buenos Aires: Docencia, 1988.

San Agustín. Confesiones. Edición crítica y anotada por el Padre Ángel Custodio Vega. 5.ª edición. Madrid: BAC, 1968.

Sloterdijk, P. Venir al mundo, venir al lenguaje. Traducido por Germán Cano. Valencia: Pre-textos, 2006.

Zambrano, M. Senderos. Barcelona: Editorial Anthropos, 1986.