Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite
Soares Filho, P. S. D., Silva, Álvaro J. M., Velasco, S. M., Barros, R. S., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2016). Assessing Symmetry by Comparing the Acquisition of Symmetric and Nonsymmetric Conditional Relations in a Capuchin Monkey. International Journal of Psychological Research, 9(2), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.2320
License terms
The work that is sent to this journal must be original, not published or sent to be published elsewhere; and if it is accepted for publication, authors will agree to transfer copyright to International Journal of Psychological Research. 

To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate. 

The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.

Abstract

The present study presents a procedure to assess the property of symmetry by comparing the acquisition of conditional relations that are consistent and inconsistent with this property in a capuchin monkey (Sapajus spp.). One young male monkey underwent arbitrary matching-to-sample training. The experiment had four phases: Phase 1.1 (establishing A1B1 and A2B2 relations), Phase 1.2 (reinforcing B1A1 and B2A2 relations, consistent with the property of symmetry), Phase 2.1 (establishing A3B3 and A4B4 relations), and Phase 2.2 (reinforcing B3A4 and B4A3 relations, inconsistent with the property of symmetry). A comparison between Phase 1.2 (consistent) and Phase 2.2 (inconsistent) showed faster acquisition of consistent relations (B1A1 and B2A2) than inconsistent relations (B3A4 and B4A3). The results suggest that the established conditional discriminations may have the property of symmetry and confirm the potential of comparative analysis between the acquisition of conditional discriminations as a promising procedure to evaluate equivalence class formation in nonhuman subjects.

Keywords:

References

Antonitis, J. J. (1951). Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 273-281. doi: 10.1037/h0060407
Azrin, N. H., Hutchinson, R. R., & Hake, D. F. (1966). Extinction-induced aggression. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 191-204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-191
Barros, R. S., Galvão, O. F., & Fontes, J. C. (1996). Um teste de simetria após treino de discriminações condicionais de posição com macaco Ateles paniscus paniscus [A symmetry test after training position conditional discriminations with macacus Ateles paniscus paniscus]. Acta Comportamentalia, 4, 181-204.
Barros, R. S., Galvão, O. F., & McIlvane, W. J. (2002). The search for relational learning capacity in Cebus apella: a programmed “educational” approach. In: S. Soraci, Jr. & K. Murata-Soraci (Eds.), Visual information processing (pp. 223-245). Westport: Praeger.
Brino, A. L., Galvão, O. F., & Barros, R. S. (2009). Successive identity matching to sample tests without reinforcement in Cebus apella. Ciências e Cognição, 14, 2-11. Retrieved from: http://cienciasecognicao.org/revista/index.php/cec/article/view/19
D’Amato, M. R., Salmon, D. P., Loukas, E., & Tomie, A. (1985). Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columbia livia). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 35-47. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-35
Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-243
Dube, W. V. & McIlvane, W. J. (1996). Some implications of a stimulus control topography analysis for emergent behavior and stimulus classes. In: T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 197-218). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dube, W. V., McIlvane, W. J., & Green, G. (1992). An analysis of generalized identity matching-to-sample test procedures. Psychological Record, 42, 17-28.
Dugdale, N. & Lowe, C. F. (2000). Testing for symmetry in conditional discriminations of language-trained chimpanzees. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 5-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-5
Epstein, R. (1983). Resurgence of previously reinforced behavior during extinction. Behaviour Analysis Letters, 3, 391-397.
Epstein, R. (1985). Extinction-induced resurgence: preliminary investigations and possible applications. Psychological Record, 35, 143-153.
Frank, A. J. (2007). An examination of the temporal and spatial stimulus control in emergent symmetry in pigeons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa. Retrieved from: http://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1342&context=etd&unstamped=1
Frank, A. J. & Wasserman, E. A. (2005). Associative symmetry in the pigeon after successive matching-to-sample training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84, 147-165. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.115-04
Galvão, O. F., Calcagno, S., & Sidman, M. (1992). Testing for emergent performance in extinction. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 10, 18-20.
Galvão, O. F., Barros, R. S., Santos, J. R., Brino, A. L. F., Brandão, S., Lavratti, C. M., Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (2005). Extent and limits of the matching concept in Cebus apella: a matter of experimental control? Psychological Record, 55, 219-232.
Galvão, O. F., Soares Filho, P. S. D., Barros, R. S., & Souza, C. B. A. (2008). Matching-to-sample as a model of symbolic behavior for bio-behavioral investigation. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 19, 149-156.
Gray, L. (1966). Backward association in pigeons. Psychonomic Science, 4, 333-334.
Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51-65. doi: 10.1037/h0062474
Hayes, S. C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385-392. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-385
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
Hogan, D. E. & Zentall, T. R. (1977). Backward associations in pigeon. American Journal of Psychology, 90, 3-15. doi: 10.2307/1421635
Holmes, P. W. (1979). Transfer of matching performance in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 103-114. Doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-103
Huziwara, E. M., Velasco, S. M., Tomanari, G. Y., de Souza, D. G., & Machado, A. (2012). Emergent relations in pigeons following training with temporal samples. Learning and Behavior, 40, 192-204. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0097-z
Kastak, D. & Schusterman, R. J. (1994). Transfer of visual identity matching-to-sample in two California sea lions (Zalophus californianus). Animal Learning and Behavior, 22, 427-435. Retrieved from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03209162
Keller, F. S. & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology: a systematic text in the science of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Lerman, D. C. & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Developing a technology for the use of operant extinction in clinical settings: an examination of basic and applied research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 345-382. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-345
Lionello-DeNolf, K. M. (2009). The search for symmetry: 25 years in review. Learning and Behavior, 37, 188-203. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.2.188.
Lionello-DeNolf, K. M. & Urcuioli, P. J. (2002). Stimulus control topographies and tests of symmetry in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 467-495. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-467
Lipkens, R., Kop, P. F. M., & Matthijs, W. (1988). A test for symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 395-409. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-395
McIlvane, W. J., Serna, R. W., Dube, W. V., & Stromer, R. (2000). Stimulus control topography coherence and stimulus equivalence: reconciling test outcomes with theory. In: J. Leslie & D. E. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analysis of human behavior (pp. 85-110). Reno: Context Press.
Picanço, C. R. & Barros, R. S. (2015). Symmetry evaluation by comparing acquisition of conditional relations in successive (Go/No-Go) matching-to-sample training. Psychological Record, 65, 131-139. Retrieved from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40732-014-0096-x
Schusterman, R. J. & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: a research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127
Sidman, M. & Cresson, O., Jr. (1973). Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77(5), 515-523. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4267398
Sidman, M. & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5
Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23-44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-23
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Sweeney M. M. & Urcuioli, P. J. (2010). Reflexivity in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94, 267-282. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-267
Urcuioli, P. J. (2008). Associative symmetry, antisymmetry, and a theory of pigeons’ equivalence-class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90, 257-282. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-257
Urcuioli, P. J. & Swisher, M. (2012). Emergent identity matching after successive matching training: II. Reflexivity or transitivity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 5-27. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-5
Vasconcelos, M. & Urcuioli, P. J. (2011). Associative symmetry in a spatial-response paradigm. Behavioural Processes, 86, 305-315. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.002
Velasco, S. M., Huziwara, E. M., Machado, A., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2010). Associative symmetry by pigeons after few-exemplar training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94(3), 283-295. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-283
Villas-Bôas, A., Murayama, V. K., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2005). Ressurgência: conceitos e métodos que podem (ou não) contribuir para a análise do comportamento. In: H. J. Guilhardi & N. C. Aguirre (Eds.), Sobre comportamento e cognição: Vol. 15. Expondo a variabilidade (pp. 18-28). Santo André: ESETec.
Wilson, K. G. & Hayes, S. C. (1996). Resurgence of derived stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 66, 267-281.doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-267
Yamamoto, J. & Asano, T. (1995). Stimulus equivalence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Psychological Record, 45, 3-21.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Cited by