Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite
Korzeniowski, C. G., Ison, M. S., & Difabio, H. (2017). Cognitive stimulation in children at social risk: its transference to school performance. International Journal of Psychological Research, 10(2), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.2760
License terms
The work that is sent to this journal must be original, not published or sent to be published elsewhere; and if it is accepted for publication, authors will agree to transfer copyright to International Journal of Psychological Research. 

To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate. 

The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.

Abstract

The present study set out to evaluate the effectiveness of a group cognitive intervention aimed at promoting executive functions in children at social risk, and its resulting effect on school performance. The quasi-experimental, pretest-posttest design included a control group. The sample was made up of 178 children (52% boys), aged 6-10. The children were evaluated by means of a battery of neuropsychological EF tests, learning achievement tests, and a teacher-rated behavioral EF scale. The intervention program included 30 group cognitive stimulation sessions that increased in difficulty and was embedded into school curricula. Trained children performed better in terms of cognitive flexibility, planning, metacognition, inhibitory control, word identification and dictation, as compared to their baseline values and children in the control group. This study provides new evidence of the effectiveness of cognitive interventions in children and its possibility to transfer cognitive gains to school performance contexts.

Key words: cognitive intervention, executive functions, school performance, children, poverty.

Keywords:

References

Altemeier, L., Jones, J., Abbott, R., & Berninger, V. (2006). Executive Functions in Becoming Writing Readers and Reading Writers: Note Taking and Report Writing in Third and Fifth Graders. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 161-173. doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn2901_8

American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073. Recuperado de http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf

Anderson, V., Anderson, P., Northam, E., Jacobs, R., & Mikiewiez, O. (2002). Relationship Between Cognitive and Behavioral Measures of Executive Function in Children with Brain Disease. Child Neuropsychology, 8(4), 231-240. doi: 10.1076/chin.8.4.231.13509

Barker, J. E., Semenov, A. D., Michaelson, L., Provan, L. S., Snyder, H. R., & Munakata, Y. (2014). Less-structured time in children’s daily lives predicts self-directed executive functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00593

Best, J., Miller, P., & Naglieri, J. (2011). Relations between Executive Function and Academic Achievement from Ages 5 to 17 in a Large, Representative National Sample. Learn Individ Differ, 21(4), 327-336. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.007

Blair, C., & Raver, C., 2014. Closing the achievement gap through modification of neurocognitive and neuroendocrine function: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial of an innovative approach to the education of children in kindergarten. PLoS ONE, 9(11), e112393, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112393

Booth, J., Boyle, J., & Kelly, S. (2014). The relationship between inhibition and working memory in predicting children’s reading difficulties. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 84-101. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12011

Carrada, M. (2011). El mecanismo atencional en niños escolarizados: Baremación de instrumentos para su medición. (Tesis doctoral). Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Argentina.

Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 98-101. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783

Comisión de Enlace Institucional. (2006). NSE 2006 Informe final. Recuperado de: https://es.scribd.com/doc/64283742/Nivel-Socio-Economico-2006-de-Argentina-23-11-2006-Informe-Final-SAIMO-AAM-CEIM

Checa, P., & Rueda, M. R. (2011). Behavioral and Brain Measures of Executive Attention and School Competence in Late Childhood. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36(8), 1018-1032. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2011.591857

Davidson, M., Amsoa, D., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2037-2078. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006

Diamond, A. (2012). Activities and Programs That Improve Children’s Executive Functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(5), 335–341. doi: 10.1177/0963721412453722

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135-168. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., & Munro, S. (2007). Preschool Program Improves Cognitive Control. Science, 318(5855), 1387-1388. doi: 10.1126/science.1151148.

Diamond, A., & Ling, D. S. (2016). Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 34-48. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005

Flores-Lázaro, J. C., Castillo-Preciado, R. E., & Jiménez-Miramonte, N. A. (2014). Desarrollo de funciones ejecutivas de la niñez a la juventud. Anales de psicología, 30(2), 463-473. doi: 10.6018/analesps.30.2.155471

Fuhs, M. W., Nesbitt, K. T., Farran, D. C., & Dong, N. (2014). Longitudinal Associations Between Executive Functioning and Academic Skills Across Content Areas. Developmental Psychology, 50(6), 1698-1709. doi: 10.1037/a0036633

García-Pérez, M., & Magaz-Lago, A. (2000). Escala Magallanes de Atención Visual. Madrid: Albor-cohs.

Georghiades, P. (2004). From the general to the situated: three decades of Metacognition. INT. J. SCI. EDUC., 26(3), 365-383. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000119401

Gioia, G. A., & Isquith, P. K. (2004). Ecological assessment of executive function in traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25(1), 135-158. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2004.9651925

Goldin, A. P., Hermida, M. J., Elías-Costa, M., López-Rosenfeld, M., Shalom, D. E., Segretin, M. S., Fernández-Slezak, D., Lipina, S. J., & Sigman, M. (2014). Far transfer to Language and Math scores of a short software-based gaming intervention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 111(17), 6443-8. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320217111

Hackman, D. A., Farah, M. J., & Meaney, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Neuroscience, 11, 651-659.  doi:10.1038/nrn2897

Horowitz-Kraus, T. (2015). Improvement in non-linguistic executive functions following reading acceleration training in children with reading difficulties: An ERP study. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4 (3), 77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2015.06.002

Hughes, C. (2011). Changes and Challenges in 20 Years of Research Into the Development of Executive Functions. Infant and Child Development, 20, 251-271. doi: 10.1002/icd.736

Ison, M. S. (2009). Abordaje psicoeductivo para estimular la atención y las habilidades interpresonales en escolares argentinos. Revista de la Facultad de Psicología – Universidad de Lima, 12, 29-51.

Ison, M. S. (2011). Programa de intervención para mejorar las capacidades atencionales en escolares argentinos. International Journal of Psychological Research, 4(2), 72-79. doi:10.21500/20112084.783

Ison, M. S., & Fachinelli, C. C. (1993). Guía de Observación Comportamental para niños. Interdisciplinaria, 12(1), 11-21.

Ison, M. S., Greco, C., Korzeniowski, C., & Morelato, G. (2015). Attentional Efficiency: a Comparative Study on Argentine Students Attending Schools from Different Socio-Cultural Contexts. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13(2), 343-368. doi: 10.14204/ejrep.36.14092

Ison, M. S., Korzeniowski, C., Segretin, M. S., & Lipina, J. S. (2015). Evaluación de la eficacia atencional en niños argentinos sin y con extraedad escolar. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 7(1), 38-52.

Ison, M. S., & Korzeniowski, C. (2016). El Rol de la Atención y Percepción Viso-Espacial en el Desempeño Lector en la Mediana Infancia. PSYKHE, 25(1), 1-13. doi:10.7764/psykhe.25.1.761

Koechlin, E., & Summerfield, C. (2007). An information theoretical aprroach to prefrontal executive fuction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(6), 229-235. doi: 10.106/j.tics.2007.04.005

Korzeniowski, C. (2015). Programa de estimulación de las funciones ejecutivas y su incidencia en el rendimiento escolar en alumnos mendocinos de escuelas primarias de zonas urbano-marginadas. (Tesis doctoral). Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Argentina.

Krikorian, R., & Bartok, J. A. (1998). Developmental data for Porteus Maze Test. The Clinical Neuropshycologist, 12(3), 305-310. doi: 10.1076/clin.12.3.305.1984

Lipina, S. J., Hermida, M. J., Segretin, M. S., Prats, L. Fracchia, C., & Colombo, J. A. (2011). Investigación en pobreza infantil desde perspectivas neurocognitivas. En S. J. Lipina y M. Sigman (Eds.), La pizarra de Babel. Puentes entre neurociencia, psicología y educación, (pp. 243-264). Buenos Aires: Libros Del Zorzal.

Lucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (1997).Mathematics and Metacognition: What is the nature of the relationship? Mathematical cognition, 3(2), 121-139. doi: 10.1080/135467997387443

Marino, J. C., Fernández, A. L., & Alderete, A. M. (2001). Valores normativos y validez conceptual del test Laberintos de Porteus en una muestra de adultos argentinos. Revista de Neurología Argentina, 26, 102-107.

Matthews, J. S., Marulis, L. M., & Williford, A. P. (2014). Gender processes in school functioning and the mediating role of cognitive self-regulation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 128-137. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2014.02.003

Matute, E., Chamorro, Y., Inozemtseva, O., Barrios, O., Rosselli, M., & Ardila, A. (2008). Efecto de la edad en una tarea de planificación y organización (‘pirámide de México’) en escolares. Revista de Neurología, 47(2), 61-70.

Matute, E., Sanz, A., Gumá, E., Roselli, M., & Ardila, A. (2009). Influencia del nivel educativo de los padres, el tipo de escuela y el sexo en el desarrollo de la atención y la memoria. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 41(2), 257-273. doi:1434/rlp.v41i2.380

Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 108, 2693-2698. doi:10.1073/pnas.1010076108.
Muñoz-Sandoval, A. F., Woodcock, R. W., Mc Grez, K. S., & Mather, N. (2005). Batería III Woodcock –Muñoz. Itsaca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

Noble, K. G., & Farah, M. J. (2013). Neurocognitive consequences of socioeconomic disparities: the intersection of cognitive neuroscience and public health. Developmental Science, 16(5), 639-640. doi: 10.1111/desc.12076.

Porteus, S. D. (2006) Laberintos de Porteus (4a ed.). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.

Roebers, C., Cimeli, P., Röthlisberger, M., & Neuenschwander, R. (2012). Executive functioning, metacognition, and self-perceived competence in elementary school children: an explorative study on their interrelations and their role for school achievement. Metacognition Learning, 7, 151-173. doi: 10.1007/s11409-012-9089-9

Röthlisberger, M., Neuenschwander, R., Cimeli, P., Michel, E., & Roebers, C. (2012). Improving executive functions in 5- and 6-year-olds: Evaluation of a small group intervention in prekindergarten and kindergarten children. Infant and Child Development, 21, 411-429. doi: 10.1002/icd.752

Segretin, M. S., Lipina, S. J., Hermida, M. J., Sheffield, T., Nelson, J. M., Espy, K. A., & Colombo, J. A. (2014). Predictors of cognitive enhancement after training in two samples of Argentinean preschoolers from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-20. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00205

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.

Turner-Nesbitt, K., Baker-Ward, L. & Willoughby, M. L. (2013). Executive function mediates socio-economic and racial differences in early academic achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 774-783. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.07.005

Welsh, J. A., Nix, R. L., Blair, C., Bierman, L., & Nelson, K. E. (2010).The Development of Cognitive Skills and Gains in Academic School Readiness for Children From Low-Income Families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 43-53. doi: 10.1037/a0016738

Woodcock, R. W., & Muñoz-Sandoval, A. F. (1996). Batería Woodcock-Muñoz: Pruebas de aprovechamiento-Revisada. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Cited by