An environmental preference scale: a proposal to measure the relationships between individuals and their environment

Martha Patricia Sánchez Miranda, Arturo De La Garza González, Ernesto Octavio López Ramírez, Guadalupe Elizabeth Morales Martínez

Abstract


The goal of the study was to measure and compare environmental preference on 59 biology students and 75 psychology students from a Mexican public university. Participants were shown 60 images of natural and urban environments, they were required to indicate the degree of relationship experienced with that environment, using a 7-point Likert scale. The results showed an internal consistency of 0.94 and a single-factor structure for the scale factor of nature dimension and three others related to an urban dimension (Entertainment, Pollution and Football Soccer). Moreover, a significant main difference on rating performance was obtained between the Biology and Psychology samples.

Keywords


Environmental preference; nature; urban; biology students; psychology students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amérigo, M., Aragonés, J. I., de Frutos, B., Sevillano, V. & Cortés, B. (2007). Underlying dimensions of ecocentric and anthropocentric environmental beliefs.The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 97-103.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N. & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612.

Balling, J. D. & Falk, J. H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments.Environment and Behavior, 14(1), 5-28.

Barla, G. R. (2002). Glosario Ecológico. Recuperado dehttp://www.elcastellano.org/glosario_ambiental.pdf

Berman, M., Jonides, J. & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature.Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207 - 1212.

Chen, S., Boucher, H. &Tapias, M. (2006). The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 151-179.

Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. En Clayton, S. &Optow, S. (Eds),Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45-66). Massachusetts, Boston: MIT Press.

Clayton, S. & Myer, G. (2009). Conservation Psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature.USA: Wiley-Blackwell.

González, L. A. (2002). La preocupación por la calidad del medioambiente. Un modelo cognitivo sobre la conducta ecológica. (Tesis Doctoral. Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid). Recuperado de http://www.ucm.es/BUCM/tesis/psi/ucm-t26479.pdf

González, A. & Amérigo, M. (1999). Actitudes hacia el medio ambiente y conducta ecológica. Psicothema, 11(1), 13-25.

Kaplan, R. (1985). The analysis of perception via preference: A strategy for studying how the environment is experienced. Landscape Plann, 12, 161-176.

Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21500/20112084.738

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.