How to Cite
Guillén Ramírez, P. (2021). On the trails of fiction (or why poetry is more than poetry) Perspectives for understanding fictional entities and their ability to solve problems. Revista Guillermo De Ockham, 19(2), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.5553 (Original work published August 31, 2021)
License terms

The Revista Guillermo de Ockham provides an immediate and open access to its content, based on the principle of offering the public a free access to investigations to provide a global interchange of knowledge.
Unless otherwise established, the contents of this journal has a license with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

  • Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • NoDerivatives: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
  • No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.


This article aims to specify how it is possible to speak of a properly literary language that contributes to the resolution of problems that arise in the order of human action. To do this, the objection that Habermas presents to the idea of a practical rationality contained in literature is examined and at the end the possible ways in which "fiction" manages to configure in a singular way what we usually call "reality" are exposed.



Austin, J. L. (1998). Cómo hacer cosas con palabras. Barcelona: Paidós.
Deleuze, G., y Guattari, F. (2001) ¿Qué es filosofía? Barcelona: Anagrama.
Frege, G. (1984). Ensayos de semántica y filosofía de la lógica. Valdés V. L. (Trad.). España. Tecnos.
Guadarrama, P. (septiembre, 2017). La responsabilidad epistémica y ética en la filosofía y la literatura. En: Hybris, 8, 81-108. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.998072
Habermas, J. (2017). El discurso filosófico de la modernidad. Buenos Aires: Katz
Nussbaum, M. C. (2005). El conocimiento del amor. Ensayos sobre filosofía y literatura (Rocío Orsi Portalo y Juana María Inajeros Ortíz, trads.) Madrid: Mínimo Tránsito
Pérez Otero, M. (2009). El estatus ontológico de los mundos posibles. En: Crítica, 41(122), 69-96. doi: 10.2307/3540876
Russell, B. (1919). Descripciones. En: L. Valdés (Ed.). (1991) La búsqueda del significado. Madrid: Tecnos.
Santamaría Velasco, F. (2016). Hacer mundos: el nombrar y la significatividad. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores.
Searle, J. (1980). Actos de habla. Ensayo de filosofía del lenguaje. Trad. J. Fillol y E. Ujaldón. En: Valdés Villanueva. L. M. (Ed.) (1991). La búsqueda del significado, pp. 83-93. Madrid: Ed.Tecnos.
Serna Arango, J. (2004). Filosofía y literatura: sendas entrecruzadas. En: Areté, 16(1), 81-99. Recuperado de http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/arete/article/view/547/537
Valdés Villanueva. L. M. (Ed.) (1991). La búsqueda del significado. Madrid: Ed. Tecnos.
Vásquez Rocca, A. (2006). El giro estético de la epistemología. La ficción como conocimiento, subjetividad y texto. En: Aisthesis, 40, 45-61. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=163221399003
Williamson, T. (1998). Bare Possibilia. En: Erkenntnis, vol. 48, pp. 257-273.


Download data is not yet available.

Cited by

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.