Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite
Demenchonok, E. (2024). Russian Philosophy on the Problem of War and Peace and Intercultural Dialogue. Revista Guillermo De Ockham, 22(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.6723 (Original work published February 6, 2024)
License terms

The Revista Guillermo de Ockham provides an immediate and open access to its content, based on the principle of offering the public a free access to investigations to provide a global interchange of knowledge.
Unless otherwise established, the contents of this journal has a license with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

  • Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • NoDerivatives: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
  • No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Abstract

This article analyzes the contribution of Russian philosophy to the humanistic tradition of promoting dialogical relations and peace. It highlights the peaceful significance of Leo Tolstoy’s ethics of nonviolence, Vladimir Solovyov’s concept of omniunity, and Mikhail Bakhtin’s dialogical philosophy. Dialogue is conceived not only as communication but also as a metaphysics of personality and meaning and as dialogical relationships at the intersubjective, social, and intercultural levels. These ideas were developed in contemporary intercultural philosophy both in Russia and Latin America. The article also analyzes the obstacles to dialogical and peaceful relations, aggravated by hegemonic geopolitics. The rise of global consciousness and anti-war movements led to the end of the Cold War in 1990 and created opportunities for a positive transformation of societies and the international system. But these opportunities were torpedoed by the neoconservative “revolution” and the U.S. policy of global hegemony in a unipolar world, triggering a new Cold War and the arms race, which threaten the future of humanity. This policy resulted in NATO’s hybrid proxy war in Ukraine, which sought to inflict a “strategic defeat” on Russia. But countries that do not want to be dominated are striving for an alternative, multipolar world of independent sovereign states, based on relations of dialogue between equals and collaboration to solve social and global problems and peace. This alternative takes shape in BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and other associations, based on sovereign equality, a balance of interests, and consensus. The article thus highlights the role of intercultural philosophy in promoting cultural diversity and dialogical relations and in developing a vision of a free, just, and peaceful world order in the future.

Keywords:

References

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. McGee, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (V. Liapunov, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Brown, A. L. (2022, December 7). Angela Merkel reveals intention of Minsk agreements. Prensa Latina. https://www.prensa-latina.cu/2022/12/07/revela-angela-merkel-intencion-de-los- acuerdos-de-minsk
Cohen, S. F. (2022). War with Russia?: From Putin and Ukraine to Trump and Russiagate. Hot Books.
Demenchonok, E. (1983). Problemy mira i sotsial’nogo progressa v tekhnocraticheskoy ideologii [Problems of peace and social progress in tekhnocratik ideology]. In Problemy mira i sotsial’nogo progressa v sovremennoy filosofii [Problems of peace and social progress in contemporary philosophy] (pp. 209–226). Politizdat.
Demenchonok, E. (1988). La “filosofía de la liberación” latinoamericana [The Latin American philosophy of liberation]. Ciencias Sociales, 1(71), 123–140.
Fornet Betancourt, R. (1996). Introducción [Introduction]. In R. Fornet Betancourt (Ed.), Kultu- ren der Philosophie. Dokumentation des I. Internationalen Kongresses für interkulturelle Philosophie [Cultures of philosophy. Documentation of the I. International Congress for Intercultural Philosophy] (pp. 10–13). Verlag der Augustinus-Buchhandlung.
Fornet Betancourt, R. (Ed.). (1999). Quo vadis, Philosophie? Antworten der Philosophen. Wissens- chaftsverlag Mainz in Aachen.
Fornet Betancourt, R. (2016). Toward a philosophy of intercultural dialogue in a conflicted world. In E. Demenchonok (Ed.), Intercultural dialogue: In search of harmony in diversity (2nd ed., pp. 43–56). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Guseynov, A. A. (2012). Filosofiya – mysl’ i postupok [Philosophy—thought and action]. Hu- manitarian University.
Horujy, S. S. (2000). O starom i novom [About the old and the new]. Aletheya.
Khurshudyan, I., Sonne, P., & DeYoung, K. (2023, March 13). Ukraine short of skilled troops and munitions as losses, pessimism grow. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost. com/world/2023/03/13/ukraine-casualties-pessimism-ammunition-shortage/
Koroshiya, I. (2023, November 25). Interview with David Arakhamia, head of the Ukrainian delega- tion at the peace talks [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0G_j-7gLnWU
Lavrov nazval neprimenimym printsip territorial’noy tselostnosti k kiyevskomu pravitel’stvu [La- vrov called the principle of territorial integrity inapplicable to the Kyiv government]. (2022, March 1). Interfax. https://www.interfax.ru/world/825440
Lektorsky, V. A. (2023). Philosophical reflections on humans, identity, and intercultural dialogue. In F. Dallmayr (Ed.), Dialogue and the new cosmopolitanism: Conversations with Edward De- menchonok (pp. 159–184). Lexington Books.
McBride, W. L. (2010). Philosophy as global dialogue and the rejection of gratuitous military violence. In E. Demenchonok (Ed.), Philosophy after Hiroshima (pp. 419–430). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2023, August). Great power rivalries: The case for realism. Le Monde Diplomatique. https://mondediplo.com/2023/08/02great-powers
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2022, April 7). Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s comment on the new draft agreement presented by the Ukrainian side, Moscow, April 7, 2022. https://www.mid.ru/en/maps/ua/1808356/
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2023, September 23). Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s statement at the General Debate at the 78th session of the UN General Assembly, New York, September 23, 2023. https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/1905973/
New King James Version (1982). Bible Gateway. ttps://www.biblegateway.com/versions/New-King-James-Version-NKJV-Bible/#booklist
Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs (1955, July 9). Statement: The Russell-Einstein manifesto. https://pugwash.org/1955/07/09/statement-manifesto/
Romanyuk, R. (2022, May 5). Ot “kapitulyatsii” Zelenskogo do kapitulyatsii Putina. Kak idut peregovory s Rossiyey [From Zelensky’s “capitulation” to Putin’s capitulation. How are negotiations with Russia going?]. Ukrainskaya Pravda. https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/ articles/2022/05/5/7344096/
Schröder, G. (2023, October 20). Gerhard Schröder im Interview: So scheiterten die Friedensverhandlungen zwischen Ukraine und Russland [Gerhard Schröder in an interview: This is how the peace negotiations between Ukraine and Russia failed] Berliner Zeitung. https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/politik-gesellschaft/gerhard-schroeder-im-exklusiv-interviewwas-merkel-2015-gemacht-hat-war-politisch-falsch-li.2151196
Smirnov, A. V. (2019). Vse-chelovecheskoye vs Obshchechelovecheskoye. YaSK Publishing House.
Smirnov, A. V. (2023). Being and process: How to “edify” “Arab reason” (and any reason at all). In F. Dallmayr (Ed.), Dialogue and the new cosmopolitanism: Conversations with Edward Demenchonok (pp. 243–255). Lexington Books.
Solovyov, V. S. (1989). Works, 2 vols. (Vol. 1). Pravda.
Solovyov, V. S. (1990). War, progress, and the end of history: Three conversations, including a short story of the anti-Christ (A. Bakshy, Trans.). Lindisfarne Press.
Solovyov, V. S. (2010). The justification of the good: An essay on moral philosophy (R. A. Duddington, Trans.). Kessinger Publishing.
Stepanyants, M. (2020). Mezhkul’turnaya filosofiya: istoki, metodologiya, problematika, perspektivy [Intercultural philosophy: Origins, methodology, problems, perspectives]. Eastern Literature.
Stepanyants, M. (2023). Striving for intercultural philosophy: The contribution of Russian philosophers. In F. Dallmayr (Ed.), Dialogue and the new cosmopolitanism: Conversations with Edward Demenchonok (pp. 69–94). Lexington Books.
Tolstoy, L. N. (1957). Complete works (Vol. 23). State Publishing House.
Tolstoy, L. N. (2001). War and peace (A. Maude & L. Maude, Trans.). The Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/2600/pg2600-images.html#link2HCH0353
Tolstoy, L. N. (2006). The kingdom of God is within you (C. Garnett, Trans.). Dower Publications.
UN General Assembly. (1970, October 24). Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/202170?ln=en
Valdai Club. (2023, October 5). Vladimir Putin meets with members of the Valdai Discussion Club. Transcript of the plenary session of the 20th Annual Meeting. https://valdaiclub.com/events/posts/articles/vladimir-putin-meets-with-members-of-the-valdai-club-transcript-2023/
Zykova, A. B. & Burgete, R. (Eds.). (1988). Iz istorii filosofii Latinskoi Ameriki XX veka [On the history of philosophy of Latin America of the XX century]. Nauka.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Cited by