Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite
Omar, A. G., Salessi, S., Vaamonde, J. D., & Urteaga, F. (2018). Core self-evaluations and work-family enrichment: the mediating role of distributive justice perceptions. Psychologia, 12(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.21500/19002386.3182
License terms

This journal provides open, immediate access to its contents, based on the principle that offering the public free access to research helps to promote a higher global exchange of knowledge.

As such, all journal articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA), by which commercial use of the original work or its possible derived works is not allowed, and the distribution thereof must be done with the same license elements regulating the original work.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Abstract

The aim of this study was twofold: to analyze the possible relationships between employees’ personality (as measured by core self-evaluations or CSE) and their feelings of work-family enrichment (WFE); and to examine whether distributive
justice perceptions act as a mediator in such relationships. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to collect data from 386 employees in public and private organizations located in Argentina. Structural equation modelling was
used to examine two integrative models that combined CSE, distributive justice, and WFE. Results reveal a good fit of the full mediation model (S-Bχ2 = 3.18, GFI= .99, CFI= .99, RMSEA= .03), in which distributive justice perceptions fully mediated the relations between CSE and WFE (γ = .13, IC= [-.03; .27]) and between CSE and FEW (γ = .09, IC= [-.08; .25]). Findings are discussed in the light of its theoretical and practical implications. The study provides valuable information for organizational authorities and HR managers to focus their efforts on both the development of CSE traits and the creation of fair and equitable work environments.

Keywords:

References

Bagozzi, R. & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 8-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2016). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

Baral, R., & Bhargava, S. (2011). Predictors of work-family enrichment: moderating effect of core self-evaluations. Journal of Indian Business Research, 3, 220-243. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554191111180573

Bentler, P. (2006). EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.

Boyar, S., & Mosley, D. C. (2007). The relationship between core self-evaluations and work and family satisfaction: The mediating role of work-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.06.001

Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work-home interface. American Psychologist, 67, 545-556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027974

Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.009

Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, M. K., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: Development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 131-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.02.002

Chang, Ch.H., Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R.E., Rosen, C.C. & Tan, J.A. (2012). Core Self- Ealuations: A review and evaluation of the literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 81-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419661

Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 199-236. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031757

Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 34-48. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2007.27895338

Fulcher, M. & Coyle, E.F. (2011). Breadwinner and caregiver: A cross-sectional analysis of children´s and emerging adults’ visions of their future family roles. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 330-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02026.x

Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2017). Making work and family work: From hard choices to smart choices. Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis.

Grzywacz, J. C., & Butler, A. B. (2005). The impact of job characteristics on work-to-family facilitation: testing a theory and distinguishing a construct. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.97

Hair, J. E., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., &Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social Identity Theory. In McKeown, S., Haji, R. & Ferguson, N. (Eds.),
Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory contemporary global perspectives (pp.3-18). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Jiang, Z., Wang, Z., Jing, X., Wallace,R., Jiang, X., & Kim, D. (2017). Core self-evaluation: Linking career social support to life satisfaction. Personality & Individual Differences, 112, 128-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.070

Judge, T., Bono, J., Erez, A., & Locke, E. (2016). Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment. In G. Boyle, J. O'Gorman, & G. Fogarty (Eds), Work and organisational psychology: Research methodology. Assessment and selection. Organisational change and development. Human resource and performance management. Emerging trends: Innovation/globalisation/technology (pp145-169.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The Core Self-Evaluations Scale (CSES): Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00152.x

Kim, T., Liden, R., Kim, S., & Lee, D. (2015). The Interplay between follower core self-evaluation and transformational leadership: Effects on employee outcomes. Journal of Business & Psychology, 30(2), 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9364-7

Kossek, E. E., Baltes, B. B., & Matthews, R. A. (2011). How work-family research can finally have an impact in organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 352-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-94342011. 01353.x

Lee, S., Lei, M., & Brody, G. (2015). Constructing confidence intervals for effect size measures of an indirect effect. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(6),600-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1040542

Lee, H. R., Murrmann, S. K., Murrmann, K. F., & Kim, K. (2010). Organizational justice as a mediator of the relationships between leader-member exchange and employees’ turnover intentions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19, 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368620903455237

Lv, A., Shen, X., Cao, Y., Su, Y., & Chen, X. (2012). Conscientiousness and organizational citizenship behavior: the mediating role of organizational justice. Social Behavior and Personality, 40, 1293-1300. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.8.1293

Ma, H., Shen, C., Yang, J., Tang, H., & Xie, J. (2014). Boundary flexibility and work-family conflict and enrichment: From person-environment fit perspective. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(4), 540-551. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2014.00540

Mäkikangas, A., Kinnunen, U., Mauno, S., & Selenko, E. (2016). Factor structure and longitudinal factorial validity of the Core Self-Evaluation Scale: Exploratory structural equation modeling. European Journal of Psychological Assessment [Electronic version]. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000357

Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42, 921-936. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094577

Michel J. & Clark, M. (2013). Investigating the relative importance of individual differences on the work-family interface and the moderating role of boundary preference for segmentation. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 29(4), 324-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2474

Moazami-Goodarzi, A., Nurmi, J., Mauno, S., & Rantanen, J. (2015). Cross-lagged relations between work–family enrichment, vigor at work, and core self-evaluations: A three-wave study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(3), 473-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9376-3

Moazami-Goodarzi, A., Rantanen, J., Nurmi, J. E., & Mauno, S. (2015). Work–Family boundary management profiles in two finnish samples: A person-oriented approach. International Journal of Business Administration, 6(6), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijbav6n6p12

Morganson, V. J., Litano, M. L., & O’Neill, S. K. (2014). Promoting work-family balance through positive psychology: A practical review of the literature. The Psychologist Manager Journal, 17, 221-244. https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000023

Omar, A. (2017). Justicia organizacional. En Littlewood, H. & Uribe Prado F. (Eds.), Psicología organizacional en Latinoamericana: un enfoque de comportamiento, productividad y factores psicosociales para académicos, estudiantes y consultores (pp. 336-379). México, DF: Universidad Autónoma de México.

Omar, A., Vaamonde, J.D., Salessi, S., & Urteaga. F. (en prensa). Psychometric properties of Colquitt’s Organizational Justice Scale in Argentinean workers. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto).

Omar, A. (2009). The moderating role of interpersonal justice on the relationship between Eysenckian personality dimensions and employee voice and employee silence. In A. Antoniou, C. Cooper, G. Chrousos, Ch. Spielberger, & M. Eysenck (Eds.), Handbook of managerial behavior and occupational health (pp. 143-156). London, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2010). Sex, gender, and the work-to-family interface: Exploring negative and positive interdependencies. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 513-534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468647

Qing, G. & Zhou, R. (2017). Bidirectional work–family enrichment mediates the relationship between family-supportive supervisor behaviors and work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 45, 299-308. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6023

Rantanen, J., Kinnunen, U., & Pulkkinen, L. (2013). The role of personality and role engagement in work-family balance. Horizons of Psychology, 22, 14-26. https://doi.org/10.20419/2013.22.376

Sahin, S. (2013). Mediator role of organizational justice in the relationship between learning organization and organizational commitment. International Journal of Academic Research Part B, 5(6), 57-67.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Wayne, J., Casper, W., Matthews, R., & Allen, T. (2013). Family-supportive organization perceptions and organizational commitment: the mediating role of work-family conflict and enrichment and partner attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 606-22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032491

Zheng, C., Molineux, J., Mirshekary, & Scarparo, S. (2015). Developing individual and organisational work-life balance strategies to improve employee health and wellbeing. Employee Relations, 37, 354-379. https://doi.org/10.1108/er-10-2013-0142

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Cited by