Phonetic Accommodation During Conversational Interactions: An Overview

Resumen

Durante las interacciones conversacionales como dar una tutoría, dar instrucciones, las negociaciones verbales, o simplemente hablar con amigos, los comportamientos de las personas experimentan una serie de cambios debido a las características de su interlocutor y a la interacción en sí. Estos cambios están presentes en cada interacción social, y la mayoría de ellos ocurre en los sonidos y ritmos del habla, lo cual se conoce como acomodación acústico-prosódica, o simplemente acomodación fonética. Las consecuencias, las limitaciones lingüísticas y sociales, y los mecanismos cognitivos subyacentes a la acomodación fonética se han estudiado durante al menos 50 años, debido a la importancia del fenómeno para varias disciplinas como la lingüística, la psicología, y la sociología. A partir del análisis y síntesis de la literatura de investigación empírica existente, en este artículo presentamos una revisión estructurada y exhaustiva de las cualidades, funciones, desarrollo onto- y filogenético, y modalidades de la acomodación fonética.

Palabras clave:

Acomodación fonética habla conversación convergencia similitud arrastre sincronización fonética interacción social

Referencias

Adank, P., Hagoort, P., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Imitation improves language comprehension. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1903-1909. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610389192
Arriaga, G., Zhou, E. P., & Jarvis, E. D. (2012). Of mice, birds, and men: The mouse ultrasonic song system has some features similar to humans and song-learning birds. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e46610. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046610
Aubanel, V., & Nguyen, N. (2010). Automatic recognition of regional phonological variation in conversational interaction. Speech Communication, 52(6), 577-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.02.008
Babel, M. (2010). Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society, 39(4), 437-456. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404510000400
Babel, M. (2011). Imitation in speech. Acoustics Today, 7(4), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3684224
Babel, M. (2012). Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001
Babel, M., & Bulatov, D. (2011). The role of fundamental frequency in phonetic accommodation. Language and Speech, 55(2), 231-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830911417695
Barón-Birchenall, L. (2016). Animal communication and human language: An overview. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 29, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.2016.29.00.07
Barón-Birchenall, L. (2018). Influence of sentence-level rhythmic regularity and phonological phrasing on linguistic accommodation during conversational interactions: The case of Spanish-speaking dyads [Doctoral dissertation, Aix Marseille Université]. HAL. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01993542
Barón-Birchenall, L. (2022). Sentence-level rhythmic regularity and accentual-group phrasing increase linguistic resemblance between Spanish-speaking interlocutors. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Beebe, B., Sorter, D., Rustin, J., & Knoblauch, S. (2003). A comparison of Meltzoff, Trevarthen, and Stern. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13(6), 777-804. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881309348768
Bell, L., Gustafson, J., & Heldner, M. (2003). Prosodic adaptation in human-computer interaction [Conference presentation]. 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain. http://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2003/papers/p15_2453.pdf
Bloom, K. (1998). The missing link’s missing link: Syllabic vocalizations at 3 months of age. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(4), 514-515. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x98251260
Bonin, F., De Looze, C., Ghosh, S., Gilmartin, E., Vogel, C., Polychroniou, A., Salamin, H., Vinciarelli, A., & Campbell, N. (2013). Investigating fine temporal dynamics of prosodic and lexical accommodation. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2013 (pp. 539-543). ISCA. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/93668/1/93668.pdf
Borrie, S. A., & Liss, J. M. (2014). Rhythm as a coordinating device: Entrainment with disordered speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(3), 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_jslhr-s-13-0149
Borrie, S. A., Lubold, N., & Pon-Barry, H. (2015). Disordered speech disrupts conversational entrainment: A study of acoustic-prosodic entrainment and communicative success in populations with communication challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01187
Casasanto, L. S., Jasmin, K., & Casasanto, D. (2010). Virtually accommodating: Speech rate accommodation to a virtual interlocutor [Conference presentation]. 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, United States. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_458220/component/file_529234/content
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893-910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893
Clopper, C. G., & Dossey, E. (2020). Phonetic convergence to Southern American English: Acoustics and perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(1), 671-683. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000555
Cohen, U., Edelist, L., & Gleason, E. (2017). Converging to the baseline: Corpus evidence for convergence in speech rate to interlocutor’s baseline. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(5), 2989-2996. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4982199
Collins, B. (1998). Convergence of fundamental frequencies in conversation: If it happens, does it matter? [Conference presentation]. 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Sydney, Australia. https://doi.org/10.21437/icslp.1998-111
Condon, W. S., & Sander, L. W. (1974). Synchrony demonstrated between movements of the neonate and adult speech. Child Development, 45(2), 456-462. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127968
Coulston, R., Oviatt, S., & Darves, C. (2002). Amplitude convergence in children’s conversational speech with animated personas [Conference presentation]. 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Denver, United States. https://doi.org/10.21437/icslp.2002-671
De Looze, C., & Rauzy, S. (2011). Measuring speakers’ similarity in speech by means of prosodic cues: Methods and potential. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2011 (pp. 1393-1396). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2011-457
De Looze, C., Oertel, C., Rauzy, S., & Campbell, N. (2011). Measuring dynamics of mimicry by means of prosodic cues in conversational speech [Conference presentation]. 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01705525/document
De Looze, C., Scherer, S., Vaughan, B., & Campbell, N. (2014). Investigating automatic measurements of prosodic accommodation and its dynamics in social interaction. Speech Communication, 58, 11-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.10.002
Delaherche, E., Chetouani, M., Mahdhaoui, A., Saint-Georges, C., Viaux, S., & Cohen, D. (2012). Interpersonal synchrony: A survey of evaluation methods across disciplines. EEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(3), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.12
Delvaux, V., & Soquet, A. (2007). The influence of ambient speech on adult speech productions through unintentional imitation. Phonetica, 64(2-3), 145-173. https://doi.org/10.1159/000107914
Doupe, A. J., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999). Birdsong and human speech: Common themes and mechanisms. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 567-631. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567
Duran, N. D., & Fusaroli, R. (2017). Conversing with a devil’s advocate: Interpersonal coordination in deception and disagreement. PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0178140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178140
Duranton, C., & Gaunet, F. (2016). Behavioural synchronization from an ethological perspective: Overview of its adaptive value. Adaptive Behavior, 24(3), 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712316644966
Edlund, J., Heldner, M., & Hirschberg, J. (2009). Pause and gap length in face-to-face interaction. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2009 (pp. 2779-2782). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2009-710
Evans, B. G., & Iverson, P. (2007). Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(6), 3814-3826. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2722209
Fehér, O., Ritt, N., & Smith, K. (2019). Asymmetric accommodation during interaction leads to the regularisation of linguistic variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, 104036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104036
Feldman, R., Mayes, L. C., & Swain, J. E. (2005). Interaction synchrony and neural circuits contribute to shared intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 697-698. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0529012x
Fitch, W. T. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817779
Freud, D., Ezrati-Vinacour, R., & Amir, O. (2018). Speech rate adjustment of adults during conversation. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 57, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.06.002
Fusaroli, R., Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Tylén, K. (2014). Dialog as interpersonal synergy. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.005
Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 8-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016
Gentilucci, M., & Bernardis, P. (2007). Imitation during phoneme production. Neuropsychologia, 45(3), 608-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.004
Gessinger, I., Schweitzer, A., Andreeva, B., Raveh, E., Möbius, B., & Steiner, I. (2018). Convergence of pitch accents in a shadowing task. In 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2018 (pp. 225-229). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2018-46
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1-68). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511663673.001
Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105(2), 251-279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.251
Goldinger, S. D., & Azuma, T. (2004). Episodic memory reflected in printed word naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(4), 716-722. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196625
Gregory, S. W., & Hoyt, B. R. (1982). Conversation partner mutual adaptation as demonstrated by Fourier series analysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01067500
Gregory, S. W., & Webster, S. (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1231-1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1231
Gregory, S. W., Webster, S., & Huang, G. (1993). Voice pitch and amplitude convergence as a metric of quality in dyadic interviews. Language & Communication, 13(3), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(93)90026-j
Hay, J., Jannedy, S., & Mendoza-Denton, N. (1999). Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design and style [Conference presentation]. 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Berkeley, United States. http://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS1999/papers/p14_1389.pdf
Heath, J. (2014). Accommodation can lead to innovated variation. University of California, Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report, 10, 119-145. https://doi.org/10.5070/p78f86j4k3
Heath, J. (2015). Convergence through divergence: Compensatory changes in phonetic accommodation. LSA 2015 Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts, 6, 1-4. http://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/ExtendedAbs/article/view/3002
Heldner, M., Edlund, J., & Hirschberg, J. (2010). Pitch similarity in the vicinity of backchannels. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2010 (pp. 3054-3057). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2010-58
Himberg, T., Hirvenkari, L., Mandel, A., & Hari, R. (2015). Word-by-word entrainment of speech rhythm during joint story building. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 797. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00797
Kawasaki, M., Yamada, Y., Ushiku, Y., Miyauchi, E., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2013). Inter-brain synchronization during coordination of speech rhythm in human-to-human social interaction. Scientific Reports, 3, 1692. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01692
Kim, M., Horton, W. S., & Bradlow, A. R. (2011). Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Laboratory Phonology, 2(1), 125-156. https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.004
King, S. L., Harley, H. E., & Janik, V. M. (2014). The role of signature whistle matching in bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus. Animal Behaviour, 96, 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.07.019
Koban, L., Ramamoorthy, A., & Konvalinka, I. (2017). Why do we fall into sync with others? Interpersonal synchronization and the brain’s optimization principle. Social Neuroscience, 14, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2017.1400463
Kousidis, S., Dorran, D., McDonnell, C., & Coyle, E. (2009). Convergence in human dialogues: Times series analysis of acoustic feature [Conference presentation]. SPECOM 2009, St. Petersburg, Russia. https://arrow.tudublin.ie/dmccon/2/
Kousidis, S., Dorran, D., Wang, Y., Vaughan, B., Cullen, C., Campbell, D., McDonnell, C., & Coyle, E. (2008). Towards measuring continuous acoustic feature convergence in unconstrained spoken dialogues. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2008 (pp. 22-26). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2008-369
Lee, C. C., Black, M., Katsamanis, A., Lammert, A. C., Baucom, B. R., Christensen, A., Georgiou, P. G., & Narayanan, S. S. (2010). Quantification of prosodic entrainment in affective spontaneous spoken interactions of married couples. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2010 (pp. 793-796). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2010-287
Lee, Y., Danner, S. G., Parrell, B., Lee, S., Goldstein, L., & Byrd, D. (2018). Articulatory, acoustic, and prosodic accommodation in a cooperative maze navigation task. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0201444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201444
Lelong, A., & Bailly, G. (2011). Study of the phenomenon of phonetic convergence thanks to speech dominoes. In A. Esposito, A. Vinciarelli, K. Vicsi, C. Pelachaud & A. Nihjolt (Eds.), Analysis of verbal and nonverbal communication and enactment: The processing issue (pp. 273-285). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25775-9_26
Levitan, R., Gravano, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2011). Entrainment in speech preceding backchannels. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8DN4DFM/download
Levitan, R., Gravano, A., Wilson, L., Beňuš, Š., Hirschberg, J., & Nenkova, A. (2012). Acoustic-prosodic entrainment and social behavior [Conference presentation]. Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Montréal, Canada. https://aclanthology.org/N12-1002.pdf
Levitan, R., & Hirschberg, J. (2011). Measuring acoustic-prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2011 (pp. 3081-3084). ISCA. https://www.isca- speech.org/archive/interspeech_2011/levitan11_interspeech.html
Lewandowski, E. M., & Nygaard, L. C. (2018). Vocal alignment to native and non-native speakers of English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(2), 620-633. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5038567
Lewandowski, N., & Jilka, M. (2019). Phonetic convergence, language talent, personality and attention. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00018
Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1404-1426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01269.x
Lubold, N., & Pon-Barry, H. (2014). A comparison of acoustic-prosodic entrainment in face-to-face and remote collaborative learning dialogues. In 2014 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) (pp. 288-293). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7078589
MacNeilage, P. F. (1998). The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(4), 499-511. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x98001265
Mampe, B., Friederici, A. D., Christophe, A., & Wermke, K. (2009). Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language. Current Biology, 19(23), 1994-1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.064
Manson, J. H., Bryant, G. A., Gervais, M. M., & Kline, M. A. (2013). Convergence of speech rate in conversation predicts cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.001
McGarva, A. R., & Warner, R. M. (2003). Attraction and social coordination: Mutual entrainment of vocal activity rhythms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(3), 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023547703110
Merker, B. J., Madison, G. S., & Eckerdal, P. (2009). On the role and origin of isochrony in human rhythmic entrainment. Cortex, 45(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.011
Mitterer, H., & Ernestus, M. (2008). The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: Evidence from the shadowing task. Cognition, 109(1), 168-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.002
Mooney, S., & Sullivan, G. C. (2015). Investigating an acoustic measure of perceived isochrony in conversation: Preliminary notes on the role of rhythm in turn transitions. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 21(2), 128-135. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol21/iss2/15
Muir, K., Joinson, A., Cotterill, R., & Dewdney, N. (2017). Linguistic style accommodation shapes impression formation and rapport in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(5), 525-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x17701327
Namy, L. L., Nygaard, L. C., & Sauerteig, D. (2002). Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(4), 422-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/026192702237958
Natale, M. (1975). Convergence of mean vocal intensity in dyadic communication as a function of social desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 790-804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.790
Nguyen, N., & Delvaux, V. (2015). Role of imitation in the emergence of phonological systems. Journal of Phonetics, 53, 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.08.004
Nielsen, K. (2011). Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.007
Oben, B., & Brône, G. (2015). What you see is what you do: On the relationship between gaze and gesture in multimodal alignment. Language and Cognition, 7(4), 546-562. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.22
Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(4), 2382-2393. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2178720
Pardo, J. S. (2013a). Reconciling diverse findings in studies of phonetic convergence. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19(1), 060140. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4798479
Pardo, J. S. (2013b). Measuring phonetic convergence in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 559. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00559
Pardo, J. S., Gibbons, R., Suppes, A., & Krauss, R. M. (2012). Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.001
Pardo, J. S., Jay, I. C., & Krauss, R. M. (2010). Conversational role influences speech imitation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2254-2264. https://doi.org/10.3758/app.72.8.2254
Pardo, J. S., Jordan, K., Mallari, R., Scanlon, C., & Lewandowski, E. (2013). Phonetic convergence in shadowed speech: The relation between acoustic and perceptual measures. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.06.002
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2021). Understanding dialogue: Language use and social interaction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610728
Polyanskaya, L., Samuel, A. G., & Ordin, M. (2019). Speech rhythm convergence as a social coalition signal. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919879335
Prat, Y., Taub, M., & Yovel, Y. (2015). Vocal learning in a social mammal: Demonstrated by isolation and playback experiments in bats. Science Advances, 1(2), e1500019. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500019
Putman, W. B., & Street, R. L. (1984). The conception and perception of noncontent speech performance: Implications for speech-accommodation theory. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1984.46.97
Rao, G., & Smiljanic, R. (2011). Effects of language, speaking style and age on prosodic rhythm [Conference presentation]. 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2011/OnlineProceedings/RegularSession/Rao/Rao.pdf
Rao, G., Smiljanic, R., & Diehl, R. (2013). Individual variability in phonetic convergence of vowels and rhythm. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19(1), 060084. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4800750
Reitter, D., & Moore, J. (2007). Predicting success in dialogue [Conference presentation]. 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic. https://era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/4165/MooreJ_Predicting%20Success%20in%20Dialogue.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Reverdy, J., Koutsombogera, M., & Vogel, C. (2020). Linguistic repetition in three-party conversations. In A. Esposito, M. Faundez-Zanuy, F. Morabito & E. Pasero (Eds.), Neural approaches to dynamics of signal exchanges (vol. 151, pp. 359-370). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8950-4_32
Ruch, H., Zürcher, Y., & Burkart, J. M. (2017). The function and mechanism of vocal accommodation in humans and other primates. Biological Reviews, 93(2), 996-1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12382
Sanchez, K., Miller, R. M., & Rosenblum, L. D. (2010). Visual influences on alignment to voice onset time. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(2), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0247)
Sancier, M. L., & Fowler, C. A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0051
Schoot, L., Heyselaar, E., Hagoort, P., & Segaert, K. (2016). Does syntactic alignment effectively influence how speakers are perceived by their conversation partner? PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0153521. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153521
Schultz, B. G., O’Brien, I., Phillips, N., McFarland, D. H., Titone, D., & Palmer, C. (2015). Speech rates converge in scripted turn-taking conversations. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1201-1220. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716415000545
Schweitzer, A., & Lewandowski, N. (2013). Convergence of articulation rate in spontaneous speech. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2013 (pp. 525-529). ISCA. https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/interspeech_2013/schweitzer13_interspeech.html
Shockley, K., Sabadini, L., & Fowler, C. A. (2004). Imitation in shadowing words. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(3), 422-429. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194890
Späth, M., Aichert, I., Ceballos-Baumann, A. O., Wagner-Sonntag, E. W., Miller, N., & Ziegler, W. (2016). Entraining with another person’s speech rhythm: Evidence from healthy speakers and individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 30(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2015.1115129
Street, R. L. (1984). Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact-finding interviews. Human Communication Research, 11(2), 139-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00043.x
Ten Bosch, L., Oostdijk, N., & Boves, L. (2005). On temporal aspects of turn taking in conversational dialogues. Speech Communication, 47(1-2), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.05.009
Thomason, J., Nguyen, H. V., & Litman, D. (2013). Prosodic entrainment and tutoring dialogue success. In H. C. Lane, K. Yacef, J. Mostow & P. Pavlik (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 750-753). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_104
Thomson, R., Murachver, T., & Green, J. (2001). Where is the gender in gendered language? Psychological Science, 12(2), 171-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00329
Trevarthen, C. (1998). The concept and foundations of infant intersubjectivity. In S. Braten (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 15-46). Cambridge University Press.
Turk, A., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2013). What is speech rhythm? A commentary on Arvaniti and Rodriquez, Krivokapić, and Goswami and Leong. Laboratory Phonology, 4(1), 93-118. https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2013-0005
Van Puyvelde, M., Loots, G., Gillisjans, L., Pattyn, N., & Quintana, C. (2015). A cross-cultural comparison of tonal synchrony and pitch imitation in the vocal dialogs of Belgian Flemish-speaking and Mexican Spanish-speaking mother–infant dyads. Infant Behavior and Development, 40, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.03.001
Vaughan, B. (2011). Prosodic synchrony in co-operative task-based dialogues: A measure of agreement and disagreement. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2011 (pp. 1865-1868). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2011-507
Ward, A., & Litman, D. (2007). Automatically measuring lexical and acoustic/prosodic convergence in tutorial dialog corpora. In Proceedings of the SLaTE Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education 2007 (pp. 57-60). http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/23210/1/cpSlate.pdf
Weise, A., & Levitan, R. (2018). Looking for structure in lexical and acoustic-prosodic entrainment behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (vol. 2, pp. 297-302). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n18-2048
Wretling, P., & Eriksson, A. (1998). Is articulatory timing speaker specific? – Evidence from imitated voices. In P. Branderud & H. Traunmüller, Proceedings of Fonetik 98 (pp. 48-51). Stockholm University. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.39.6122&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Wynn, C. J., & Borrie, S. A. (2020). Methodology matters: The impact of research design on conversational entrainment outcomes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(5), 1352-1360. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00243
Wynn, C. J., Borrie, S. A., & Pope, K. A. (2019). Going with the flow: An examination of entrainment in typically developing children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(10), 3706-3713. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-19-0116
Wynn, C. J., Borrie, S. A., & Sellers, T. P. (2018). Speech rate entrainment in children and adults with and without autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_ajslp-17-0134
Xu, Y., & Reitter, D. (2016). Convergence of syntactic complexity in conversation. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (vol. 2, pp. 443-448). ACL. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/p16-2072
Yu, A. C. L., Abrego-Collier, C., & Sonderegger, M. (2013). Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference perspective: Subjective attitude, personality and “autistic” traits. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e74746. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074746
Yu, L., Hattori, Y., Yamamoto, S., & Tomonaga, M. (2018). Understanding empathy from interactional synchrony in humans and non-human primates. In L. D. Di Paolo, F. Di Vincenzo & F. De Petrillo (Eds.), Evolution of primate social cognition (vol. 5, pp. 47-58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93776-2_4

Citado por