How to Cite
Ruiz-García, A. ., Macías-Morón, J. J. ., Ferro-García, R. ., & Valero-Aguayo, L. (2021). English Spanish Validation of the “Life Snapshot Inventory”. International Journal of Psychological Research, 14(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5095
License terms
The work that is sent to this journal must be original, not published or sent to be published elsewhere; and if it is accepted for publication, authors will agree to transfer copyright to International Journal of Psychological Research. 

To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate. 

The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.


Introduction: The Life Snapshot Inventory (LSI) is a self-report instrument to measure the meaningful vital, personal, and social directions. It was created in the Functional Analytic Psychotherapy as a continuous evaluation of vital changes in areas of life (family, work, love, spirituality, sexuality, health, etc.). Objective: The aim was to validate its psychometric characteristics for the first time. Method: This study involved 530 participants (average age 33 years), in a Spanish sample. The questionnaire has been compared with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) to obtain convergent validity. Results: The results showed a high internal consistency (α=.93) and a correlation of .61, both statistically significant. The factorial analysis showed only one factor (43.56% of variance). In addition, it was sensitive to changes due to interventions, and made it possible to differentiate those people with vital problems. Conclusion: This questionnaire could be a helpful measure for healthcare and clinical contexts.



Ancer, L., Meza, C., Pompa, E., Torres, F., & Landoro, R. (2011). Relación entre niveles de autoestima y estrés en estudiantes universitarios [Relationship between self-esteem and stress levels in university students]. Enseñanza e Investigación Psicológica, 16, 91–101.

Atienza, F. L., Moreno, Y., & Balaguer, I. (2000). Análisis de la dimensionalidad de la escala de autoestima de Rosenberg en una muestra de adolescentes valencianos [Analysis of the dimensionality of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in a sample of valencian adolescents]. Revista de Psicología. Universitas Tarraconesis, 22 (1–2), 29–42.

Bajaj, B., Robins, R., & Pande, N. (2018). Mediating role of self-esteem on the relationship between mindfulness, anxiety, and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 127–131. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaid.2016.02.085.

Céspedes, C., Rubio, A., Viñas, F., Mqlo, S., Lara, E., & Ríos, J. (2021). Relationship between selfconcept, selt-efficacy, and subjective well-being of native and migrant adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 620782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.620782.

Diener, E., & Diener, M. (2009). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. In Diener E. (Eds.) Culture and Well-Being: Social Indicators Research Series, Vol 38 (pp. 71–92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0_4.

Emerson, S. D., Guhn, M., & Gadermann, A. M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the satisfaction with life scale: Reviewing three decades of research. Quality of Life Research, 26 (9), 2251–2264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1552-2.

Gnambs, T., & Kaspar, K. (2016). Socially desirable responding in web-based questionnaires: A metaanalytic review of the candour hypothesis. Assessment, 24 (6), 746–762. https://doi.org/0.1177/10731921115624547.

Grant, N., Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2009). The relationship between life satisfaction and health behavior: A cross-cultural analysis of young adult. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9032-x.

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. (Second Edition). Guilford.

Kanter, J. W., Manbeck, K. E., Kuczynski, A. M., Maitland, D. W., Villas-Bôas, A., & Ortega, M. A. R. (2017). A comprehensive review of research on functional analytic psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 58, 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.010.

Kohlenberg, R. J., Tsai, M., Ferro García, R., Valero, L., Fernández Parra, A., & Virués-Ortega, J. (2005). Psicoterapia analítico-funcional y terapia de aceptación y compromiso: Teoría, aplicaciones y continuidad con el análisis del comportamiento [Functional analytical psychotherapy and acceptance and commitment therapy: Theory, applications and continuity with the behavior analysis]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5 (2), 37–67.

Krieger, T., Hermann, H., Zimmermann, J., & Grosse Holtforth, M. (2015). Associations of self-compassion and global self-esteem with positive and negative affect and stress reactivity in daily life: Findings from a smart phone study. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 288–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.009.

Leary, M. R., & MacDonald, G. (2003). Individual differences in self-esteem: A review and theoretical integration. In M. R. Leary, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 401418). The Guilford Press.

Lin, C. C. (2015). Self-esteem mediates the relationship between dispositional gratitude and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.045.

Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Zhou, C., & Li, T. (2014). Affect and self-esteem as mediators between trait resilience and psychological adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.023.

López-Bermúdez, M. A., Ferro-García, R., Calvillo-Mazarro, M., & Valero-Aguayo, L. (2021). Importance of the therapeutic relationship: Efficacy of functional analytic psychotherapy with different problems. Clinica y Salud, 32 (3), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.5093/cl6sa2020a32.

Macías, J., Valero-Aguayo, L., Bond, F. W., & Blanca, M. J. (2019). The efficacy of functional-analytic psychotherapy and acceptance and commitment therapy (FACT) for public employees. Psicothema, 31 (1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.202.

Maitland, D. W. M., & Gaynor, S. T. (2012). Promoting efficacy research on functional analytic psychotherapy. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 7 (2–3), 125–134. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/h0100947.

Maitland, D. W. M., Kanter, J. W., Manbeck, K. E., & Kuczynski, A. M. (2017). Relationship science informed clinically relevant behaviors in functional analytic psychotherapy: The awareness, courage, and love model. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6 (4), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.07.002.

Mangabeira, V., Del Prette, G., & Kanter, J. (2012). Functional analytic psychotherapy: A review of publications from 1990 to 2010. International Journal of Behavior Consultation and Therapy, 7 (2–3), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100941.

Mann, M., Hosman, C., Sschaalma, H., & de Vries, N. (2004). Self-esteem in a broad-spectrum approach to mental health promotion. Health Education Research, 19 (4), 357–372. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg041.

Miller, B. K., Zuvnuska, S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2019). Self-perception and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.12.003.

Moksnes, U. K., & Espnes, G. A. (2013). Self-esteem and life satisfaction in adolescents: Gender and age as potential moderators. Quality of Life Research, 22, 2921–2928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0427-4.

Orth, U., & Robins, R. W. (2014). The development of self-esteem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23 (5), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414547414.

Reilly, E. R., Ritzert, T. R., Scoglio, A. A. J., Mote, J., Fukyuda, S. D., Ahern, M. E., & Kelly, M. M. (2019). A systematic review of values measures in acceptance and commitment therapy research. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 12, 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbs.2018.10.004.

Richter, D., Wall, A., Bruen, A., & Whittington, R. (2019). Is the global prevalence rate of adult mental illness increasing? Systematic review and metaanalysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 140 (5), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13083.

Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image (revised edition).WesleyanUniversityPress. Salerno, L., Ingoglia, S., & Lo Coco, G. (2017). Competing factor structures of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale and its measurement invariance across clinical and non-clinical samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.063.

Schmitt, D., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg self- esteem scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 623–642. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0022-35414.89.4.623.

Sortheix, F. M., & Lönnqvist, J. E. (2013). Personal values priorities and life satisfaction in Europe: The moderating role of socioeconomic development. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45 (2), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113504621.

Tsai, M., Kohlenberg, R. J., Kanter, J. W., Kohlenberg, B., Follete, W. C., & Callaghan, G. M. (2009). Aguide to functional analytic psychotherapy. Awareness, courage, love, and behaviorism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09787-9.

Tsai, M., Yoo, D., Hardebeck, E. J., Loudon, M. P., & Kohlenberg, R. J. (2019). Creating safe, evocative, attuned, and mutually vulnerable therapeutic beginnings: Strategies from functional analytic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 56 (1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000203.

Valero-Aguayo, L., & Ferro-García, R. (2015). Psicoterapia analítica funcional. El análisis functional en la sesión clínica [Functional analytic psychotherapy: The functional analysis of the clinical session]. Síntesis Editorial.

Valero-Aguayo, L., & Ferro-García, R. (2018). Tratando con psicoterapia analítica funcional [Treating with functional analytic psychotherapy]. Piramide Editorial.

Valero-Aguayo, L., Ferro-García, R., López-Bermúdez, M. A., & Selva-López, M. A. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the experiencing of self scale (EOSS) for assessment in functional analytic psychotherapy. Psycothema, 26 (3), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2014.15.

Vázquez, A. J., Jiménez, R., & Vázquez-Morejón, R. (2004). Escala de autoestima de Rosenberg: fiabilidad y validez en población clínica española [Rosenberg self-esteem scale: Reliability and validity in a Spanish clinical sample]. Apuntes de Psicología, 22 (2), 247–255.

Villas-Bôas, S. B., A.and Meyer, & Kanter, J. W. (2016). The effects of analyses of contingencies on clinically relevant behaviors and out-of-session changes in functional analytic psychotherapy. The Psychological Record, 66 (4), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0195-y.

Wersebe, H., Lieb, R., Meyer, A. H., Hofer, P., & Gloster, A. T. (2018). The link between stress, well-being, and psychological flexibility during an acceptance and commitment therapy self-help intervention. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 18 (1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.09.002.

Wilson, K. G., Sandoz, E. K., Kitchens, J., & Roberts, M. (2010). Thevalued living questionnaire:Defining and measuring valued action within a behavioral framework. The Psychological Record, 60, 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395706.


Download data is not yet available.

Cited by