Economic Decisions, Attractiveness, and Intrasexual Competition during Menstrual Cycle in the Ultimatum Game
Authors
Fraidy-Alonso Alzate-Pamplona
Óscar Galindo-Caballero
Juan Pablo Sánchez Escudero
Johny Villada Zapata
View/Download
PDF
FLIP
XML
HTML
How to Cite
Alzate-Pamplona, F.-A., Galindo-Caballero, Óscar, Sánchez Escudero, J. P., & Villada Zapata, J. (2023). Economic Decisions, Attractiveness, and Intrasexual Competition during Menstrual Cycle in the Ultimatum Game. International Journal of Psychological Research, 16(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5919
More Citation Formats
License terms
▼
The work that is sent to this journal must be original, not published or sent to be published elsewhere; and if it is accepted for publication, authors will agree to transfer copyright to International Journal of Psychological Research.
To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate.
The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.
To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate.
The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.
Abstract
Introduction: it seems that, in the phase of greatest fertility, women’s intrasexualcompetition (toward attractive women who live nearby) increases due to access to resources, status, and biologically desirable partners. Objective: to comparethe economic decisions (ED) during the ovulatory (OP) and luteal (LP) phasesof the menstrual cycle (MC) with exposure to two stimuli: a photograph of amore attractive woman and a photograph of a less attractive woman, throughthe ultimatum game (UG). Methodology: the research followed a cross-sectional design between subjects to see group differences by contrasting hypotheses. The sampling was probabilistic, with a sample of 100 heterosexual women, students at a public university with an age range of 18 to 24 years, with regular MC, who did not use hormonal contraceptive methods and did not have any endocrine condition. The inverse counting method with confirmation was applied to identify CM phases; and the UG to evaluate the DE. Results: the phases of the MC had no effect on the ED; the women behaved similarly in their decisions, regardless ofthe phase of the cycle they were in or the type of stimulus to which they were exposed. Conclusion: OP and LP do not affect the ED of women when they are exposed to an attractive stimulus. The discussion is made considering the evolutionary theory of the ovulatory shift hypothesis.
Keywords:
References
Allen, A. M., McRae-Clark, A. L., Carlson, S., Saladin, M. E., Gray, K. M., Wetherington, C. L., McKee, S. A., & Allen, S. S. (2016). Determining Menstrual Phase in Human Biobehavioral Research. A Review with Recommendations. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 24 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000057
Alzate-Pamplona, F.-A. (2020). Decisiones económicas en los cambios hormonales de la mujer. Editorial Bonaventuriana. https://doi.org/10.21500/EB.9789588474915
American Psychological Association–APA. (2003). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. APA.
Asociación Médica Mundial. (2013). Declaración de Helsinki. Principios éticos para las investigaciones con seres humanos. Asociación Médica Mundial. https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/
Barel, E., Shahrabani, S., & Tzischinsky, O. (2017). Sex Hormone/Cortisol Ratios Differentially Modulate Risk-Taking in Men and Women. Evolutionary Psychology, 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917697333
Beall, A. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2013). Women Are More Likely to Wear Red or Pink at Peak Fertility. Psychological Science, 24 (9), 1837–1841. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613476045
Buffet, N. C., Djakoure, C., Maitre, S. C., & Bouchard, P. (1998). Regulation of the Human Menstrual Cycle. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 19 (3), 151–186. https://doi.org/10.1006/frne.1998.0167
Buser, T. (2012). Digit ratios, the Menstrual Cycle and Social Preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 76 (2), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.07.006
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408
Casto, K. V., & Prasad, S. (2017). Recommendations for the study of women in hormones and competition research. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.05.009
Catena, T. M., Simmons, Z. L., & Roney, J. R. (2019). Do Women’s Faces Become more Attractive near Ovulation? Hormones and Behavior, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.07.008
Chen, Y., Katuˇaˇcák, P., & Ozdenoren, E. (2013). Why can’t a woman bid more like a man? Games and Economic Behavior, 77 (1), 181–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.002
Colegio Colombiano de Psicólogos. (2009). Deontología y Bioética del ejercicio de la Psicología en Colombia. Colegio Colombiano de Psicólogos.
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1982, February 19). Ley 23. Sobre derechos de autor. Diario Oficial 35.499. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.phpi=3431#::text=Esta%20Ley%20protege%20exclusivamente%20la,obras%20literarias%2C%20cient%C3%ADficas%20y%20art%C3%ADsticas
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2000, July 24). Ley 599. Por la cual se expide el Código Penal. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0599_2000.html
Cook, C. J., & Crewther, B. T. (2019). Within- and Between-Person Variation in Morning Testosterone is Associated with Economic Risk-Related Decisions in Athletic Women Across the Menstrual Cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 112, 77–
80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.04.007
Derntl, B., Pintzinger, N., Kryspin-Exner, I., & Schöpf, V. (2014). The Impact of Sex Hormone Concentrations on Decision-Making in Females and Males. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8 (OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00352
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Cantú, S. M., & Simpson, J. A. (2014). Money, Status, and the Ovulatory Cycle. Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0327
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Hill, S. E., Perilloux, C., & Li, N. P. (2011). Ovulation, Female Competition, and Product Choice: Hormonal Influences on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (6), 921–934. https://doi.org/10.1086/656575
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., & Ulu, S. S. (2020). The Effect of Fertility on Loss Aversion. Journal of Business Research, 120, 599–607.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.043
Durante, K. M., Li, N. P., & Haselton, M. G. (2008). Changes in Women’s Choice of Dress Across the Ovulatory Cycle: Naturalistic and Laboratory Task-Based Evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34 (11), 1451–1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208323103
Eisenbruch, A. B., & Roney, J. R. (2016). Conception Risk and the Ultimatum Game: When Fertility is High, Women Demand More. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 272–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.047
Fisher, M. L. (2004). Female Intrasexual Competition Decreases Female Facial Attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271 (SUPPL. 5), 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0160.
Galindo-Caballero, Ó., Alzate-Pamplona, F. .-., Gangestad, S., & Cruz, J. E. (n.d.). A review and pcurve analysis of research on the menstrual cycle correlates of consumer preferences and economic decisions. Hormones; Behavior.
Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., Welling, L. L. M., Gildersleeve, K., Pillsworth, E. G., Burriss, R. P.,Larson, C. M., & Puts, D. A. (2016). How Valid are Assessments of Conception Probability in Ovulatory Cycle Research? Evaluations, Recommendations, and Theoretical Implications. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37 (2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.09.001
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual Cycle Variation in Women’s Preferences for the Scent of Symmetrical Men. Proceedings of theRoyal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265 (1399), 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0380
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (2008). Human Oestrus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275 (1638), 991–1000. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1425
Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do Women’s Mate Preferences Change Across the Ovulatory Cycle? A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 140 (5), 1205–1259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035438
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) Facial Attractiveness and Sexual Selection: The Role of Symmetry and Averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108 (3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant Benevolence and Conspicuous Consumption: When Romantic Motives Elicit Strategic Costly Signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93 (1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.85
Guéguen, N. (2012). Makeup and Menstrual Cycle: Near Ovulation, Women Use More Cosmetics. Psychological Record, 62 (3), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395819
Güth, W., & Kocher, M. G. (2014). More than Thirty Years of Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments: Motives, Variations, and a Survey of the Recent Literature. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 108, 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.06.006
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3 (4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
Hardy, B. (2019). Steroid Hormones in Social Science Research. In G. Foster (Ed.), Biophysical measurement in experimental social science research (1.a, pp. 105–148). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813092-6.00008-3
Haselton, M. G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E. G., BleskeRechek, A., & Frederick, D. A. (2007). Ovulatory Shifts in Human Female Ornamentation: Near Ovulation, Women Dress to Impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51 (1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.07.007
Hevia-Orozco, J., Sanz-Martín, A., Hidalgo-Aguirre, R. M., Hernández-González, M., & Guevara, M. A. (2014). Evaluación de la toma de decisiones sociales a través del Ultimatum Game versión computarizada. Eneurobiología, 5 (10), 1–11
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644-1655. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024700
Kaighobadi, F., & Stevens, J. R. (2013). Does Fertility Status Influence Impulsivity and Risk Taking in Human Females? Adaptive Influences on Intertemporal Choice and Risky Decision Making. Evolutionary Psychology, 11 (3), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100314
Knight,E. L., Sarkar, A.,Prasad, S. &Mehta,P. H. (2020). Beyond the Challenge Hypothesis: The Emergence of the Dual-Hormone Hypothesis and Recommendations for Future Research. Hormones and Behavior, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104657
Kurath, J. D., & Mata, R. (2018). Individual Differences in Risk Taking and Endogeneous Levels of Testosterone, Estradiol, and Cortisol: A Systematic Literature Search and Three Independent Meta-Analyses. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 90, 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.003
Lazzaro, S. C., Rutledge, R. B., Burghart, D. R., & Glimcher, P. W. (2016). The Impact of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Economic Choice and Rationality. PLoS ONE, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144080
Lobmaier, J. S., Bobst, C., & Probst, F. (2016). Can Women Detect Cues to Ovulation in Other Women’s Faces? Biology Letters, 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0638
Lucas, M., & Koff, E. (2013). How Conception Risk Affects Competition and Cooperation with Attractive Women and Men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34 (1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.08.001
Lucas, M., Koff, E., & Skeath, S. (2007). Pilot Study of Relationship Between Fertility Risk and Bargaining. Psychological Reports, 101 (1), 302–310.https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.101.1.302-310
Mafra, A. L., Varella, M. A. C., Defelipe, R. P., Anchieta, N. M., Almeida, C. A. G., & Valentova, J. V. (2020). Makeup Usage in Women as a Tactic to Attract Mates and Compete with Rivals. Personality and Individual Differences, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110042
Mehta, P. H., Mor, S., Yap, A. J., & Prasad, S. (2015). Dual-Hormone Changes Are Related to Bargaining Performance. Psychological Science, 26 (6), 866–876.https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615572905
Mehta, P. H., & Prasad, S. (2015). The Dual-Hormone Hypothesis: A Brief Review and Future Research Agenda. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences,3, 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.008
Mehta, P. H., Welker, K. M., Zilioli, S., & Carré, J. M. (2015). Testosterone and Cortisol Jointly Modulate Risk-Taking. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 56,88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.02.023
Mihm, M., Gangooly, S., & Muttukrishna, S. (2011).The Normal Menstrual Cycle in Women. Animal Reproduction Science, 124 (3–4), 229–236.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.030
Ministerio de Salud. (1993, October 4). Resolución 008430. Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. DO. 49427. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430-DE-1993.PDF
Necka, E. A., Puts, D. A., Dimitroff, S. J., & Norman, G. J. (2016). Other Women’s Fertility Moderates Female Resource Distribution Across the Menstrual Cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37 (5), 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.03.003
Nikiforidis, L., Arsena, A. R., & Durante, K. M. (2017). The Effect of Fertility on Women’s Intrasexual Competition. In M. Fisher (Ed.), The oxford handbook of women and competition (1a, pp. 397–410). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.23
Patzer, G. L. (1985). The Physical Attractiveness Phenomena. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0202-6
Pearson, M., & Schipper, B. C. (2013). Menstrual Cycle and Competitive Bidding. Games and Economic Behavior, 78 (1), 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.008
Probst, F., Golle, J., Lory, V., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2018).Reactive Aggression Tracks Within-Participant Changes in Women’s Salivary Testosterone. Aggressive Behavior, 44 (4), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21757
Regan, P. C. (1996). Rhythms of Desire: The Association Between Menstrual Cycle Phases and Female Sexual Desire. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 5 (3), 145–156. https://doi.org/https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2s2.00030475027&partnerID=40&md5=5e06ac9b05b9d7150b6cf2c89d83a781
Rhode, D. L. (2010). The Beauty Bias: The Injustice of Appearance in Life and Law. Oxford University Press.
Rhodes, G. (2006). The Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57,199–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
Rodríguez Ruiz, C. (2019). Efecto de variables asociadas a hormonas sexuales en el comportamiento prosocial humano en distintos contextos experimentales. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Saad, G., & Stenstrom, E. (2012). Calories, Beauty, and Ovulation: The Effects of the Menstrual Cycle on Food and Appearance-Related Consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22 (1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.001
Schipper, B. C. (2015). Sex hormones and competitive bidding. Management Science, 61 (2), 249–266.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1959
Stanton, S. J. (2017). The Role of Testosterone and Estrogen in Consumer Behavior and Social & Economic Decision Making: A Review. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.11.006
Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous Consumption as a Sexual Signaling System. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100 (4), 664–680.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021669
Unesco. (2005). Declaración universal sobre bioética y derechos humanos. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000146180_spa
Van Damme, E., Binmore, K. G., Roth, A. E., Samuelson, L., Winter, E., Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A., Dufwenberg, M., Kirchsteiger, G., Gneezy, U., Kocher, M. G., Sutter, M., Sanfey, A. G.,Kliemt, H., Selten, R., Nagel, R., & Azar, O. H.(2014). How Werner Güth’s Ultimatum Game Shaped our Understanding of Social Behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 108, 292–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.10.014
Varella, M. A. C., Valentova, J. V., Fernández, A. M., & Fisher, M. L. (2015). Evolution of Artistic and Aesthetic Propensities Through Female Competitive Ornamentation. In M. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook ofWomen and Competition (pp.757–784). Oxford Library of Psychology.
Wilcox, A. J., Day Baird, D., Dunson, D. B., McConnaughey, D. R., Kesner, J. S., & Weinberg, C. R. (2004). On the Frequency of Intercourse around Ovulation: Evidence for Biological Influences. Human Reproduction, 19 (7), 1539–1543. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh305
Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D., & Baird, D. D. (2000). The Timing of the “fertile window” in the Menstrual Cycle: Day Specific Estimates from a Prospective Study. British Medical Journal, 321 (7271),1259–1262. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1259
Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D. B., Weinberg, C. R., Trussell, J., & Baird, D. D. (2001). Likelihood of Conception with a Single Act of Intercourse: Providing Benchmark Rates for Assessment of Post-Coital Contraceptives. Contraception, 63 (4), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00191-3
Zethraeus, N., Kocoska-Maras, L., Ellingsen, T., Schoultz, B., Hirschberg, A. L., & Johannesson, M. (2009). A Randomized Trial of the Effect of Estrogen and Testosterone on Economic Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (16), 6535–6538. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812757106
Zhuang, J.-Y., & Wang, J.-X. (2014). Women Ornament Themselves for Intrasexual Competition near Ovulation, but for Intersexual Attraction in Luteal Phase. PLoS ONE, 9 (9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106407
Alzate-Pamplona, F.-A. (2020). Decisiones económicas en los cambios hormonales de la mujer. Editorial Bonaventuriana. https://doi.org/10.21500/EB.9789588474915
American Psychological Association–APA. (2003). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. APA.
Asociación Médica Mundial. (2013). Declaración de Helsinki. Principios éticos para las investigaciones con seres humanos. Asociación Médica Mundial. https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/
Barel, E., Shahrabani, S., & Tzischinsky, O. (2017). Sex Hormone/Cortisol Ratios Differentially Modulate Risk-Taking in Men and Women. Evolutionary Psychology, 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917697333
Beall, A. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2013). Women Are More Likely to Wear Red or Pink at Peak Fertility. Psychological Science, 24 (9), 1837–1841. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613476045
Buffet, N. C., Djakoure, C., Maitre, S. C., & Bouchard, P. (1998). Regulation of the Human Menstrual Cycle. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 19 (3), 151–186. https://doi.org/10.1006/frne.1998.0167
Buser, T. (2012). Digit ratios, the Menstrual Cycle and Social Preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 76 (2), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.07.006
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408
Casto, K. V., & Prasad, S. (2017). Recommendations for the study of women in hormones and competition research. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.05.009
Catena, T. M., Simmons, Z. L., & Roney, J. R. (2019). Do Women’s Faces Become more Attractive near Ovulation? Hormones and Behavior, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.07.008
Chen, Y., Katuˇaˇcák, P., & Ozdenoren, E. (2013). Why can’t a woman bid more like a man? Games and Economic Behavior, 77 (1), 181–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.002
Colegio Colombiano de Psicólogos. (2009). Deontología y Bioética del ejercicio de la Psicología en Colombia. Colegio Colombiano de Psicólogos.
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1982, February 19). Ley 23. Sobre derechos de autor. Diario Oficial 35.499. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.phpi=3431#::text=Esta%20Ley%20protege%20exclusivamente%20la,obras%20literarias%2C%20cient%C3%ADficas%20y%20art%C3%ADsticas
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2000, July 24). Ley 599. Por la cual se expide el Código Penal. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0599_2000.html
Cook, C. J., & Crewther, B. T. (2019). Within- and Between-Person Variation in Morning Testosterone is Associated with Economic Risk-Related Decisions in Athletic Women Across the Menstrual Cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 112, 77–
80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.04.007
Derntl, B., Pintzinger, N., Kryspin-Exner, I., & Schöpf, V. (2014). The Impact of Sex Hormone Concentrations on Decision-Making in Females and Males. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8 (OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00352
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Cantú, S. M., & Simpson, J. A. (2014). Money, Status, and the Ovulatory Cycle. Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0327
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Hill, S. E., Perilloux, C., & Li, N. P. (2011). Ovulation, Female Competition, and Product Choice: Hormonal Influences on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (6), 921–934. https://doi.org/10.1086/656575
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., & Ulu, S. S. (2020). The Effect of Fertility on Loss Aversion. Journal of Business Research, 120, 599–607.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.043
Durante, K. M., Li, N. P., & Haselton, M. G. (2008). Changes in Women’s Choice of Dress Across the Ovulatory Cycle: Naturalistic and Laboratory Task-Based Evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34 (11), 1451–1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208323103
Eisenbruch, A. B., & Roney, J. R. (2016). Conception Risk and the Ultimatum Game: When Fertility is High, Women Demand More. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 272–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.047
Fisher, M. L. (2004). Female Intrasexual Competition Decreases Female Facial Attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271 (SUPPL. 5), 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0160.
Galindo-Caballero, Ó., Alzate-Pamplona, F. .-., Gangestad, S., & Cruz, J. E. (n.d.). A review and pcurve analysis of research on the menstrual cycle correlates of consumer preferences and economic decisions. Hormones; Behavior.
Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., Welling, L. L. M., Gildersleeve, K., Pillsworth, E. G., Burriss, R. P.,Larson, C. M., & Puts, D. A. (2016). How Valid are Assessments of Conception Probability in Ovulatory Cycle Research? Evaluations, Recommendations, and Theoretical Implications. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37 (2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.09.001
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual Cycle Variation in Women’s Preferences for the Scent of Symmetrical Men. Proceedings of theRoyal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265 (1399), 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0380
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (2008). Human Oestrus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275 (1638), 991–1000. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1425
Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do Women’s Mate Preferences Change Across the Ovulatory Cycle? A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 140 (5), 1205–1259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035438
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) Facial Attractiveness and Sexual Selection: The Role of Symmetry and Averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108 (3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant Benevolence and Conspicuous Consumption: When Romantic Motives Elicit Strategic Costly Signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93 (1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.85
Guéguen, N. (2012). Makeup and Menstrual Cycle: Near Ovulation, Women Use More Cosmetics. Psychological Record, 62 (3), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395819
Güth, W., & Kocher, M. G. (2014). More than Thirty Years of Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments: Motives, Variations, and a Survey of the Recent Literature. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 108, 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.06.006
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3 (4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
Hardy, B. (2019). Steroid Hormones in Social Science Research. In G. Foster (Ed.), Biophysical measurement in experimental social science research (1.a, pp. 105–148). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813092-6.00008-3
Haselton, M. G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E. G., BleskeRechek, A., & Frederick, D. A. (2007). Ovulatory Shifts in Human Female Ornamentation: Near Ovulation, Women Dress to Impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51 (1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.07.007
Hevia-Orozco, J., Sanz-Martín, A., Hidalgo-Aguirre, R. M., Hernández-González, M., & Guevara, M. A. (2014). Evaluación de la toma de decisiones sociales a través del Ultimatum Game versión computarizada. Eneurobiología, 5 (10), 1–11
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644-1655. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024700
Kaighobadi, F., & Stevens, J. R. (2013). Does Fertility Status Influence Impulsivity and Risk Taking in Human Females? Adaptive Influences on Intertemporal Choice and Risky Decision Making. Evolutionary Psychology, 11 (3), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100314
Knight,E. L., Sarkar, A.,Prasad, S. &Mehta,P. H. (2020). Beyond the Challenge Hypothesis: The Emergence of the Dual-Hormone Hypothesis and Recommendations for Future Research. Hormones and Behavior, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104657
Kurath, J. D., & Mata, R. (2018). Individual Differences in Risk Taking and Endogeneous Levels of Testosterone, Estradiol, and Cortisol: A Systematic Literature Search and Three Independent Meta-Analyses. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 90, 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.003
Lazzaro, S. C., Rutledge, R. B., Burghart, D. R., & Glimcher, P. W. (2016). The Impact of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Economic Choice and Rationality. PLoS ONE, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144080
Lobmaier, J. S., Bobst, C., & Probst, F. (2016). Can Women Detect Cues to Ovulation in Other Women’s Faces? Biology Letters, 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0638
Lucas, M., & Koff, E. (2013). How Conception Risk Affects Competition and Cooperation with Attractive Women and Men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34 (1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.08.001
Lucas, M., Koff, E., & Skeath, S. (2007). Pilot Study of Relationship Between Fertility Risk and Bargaining. Psychological Reports, 101 (1), 302–310.https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.101.1.302-310
Mafra, A. L., Varella, M. A. C., Defelipe, R. P., Anchieta, N. M., Almeida, C. A. G., & Valentova, J. V. (2020). Makeup Usage in Women as a Tactic to Attract Mates and Compete with Rivals. Personality and Individual Differences, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110042
Mehta, P. H., Mor, S., Yap, A. J., & Prasad, S. (2015). Dual-Hormone Changes Are Related to Bargaining Performance. Psychological Science, 26 (6), 866–876.https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615572905
Mehta, P. H., & Prasad, S. (2015). The Dual-Hormone Hypothesis: A Brief Review and Future Research Agenda. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences,3, 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.008
Mehta, P. H., Welker, K. M., Zilioli, S., & Carré, J. M. (2015). Testosterone and Cortisol Jointly Modulate Risk-Taking. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 56,88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.02.023
Mihm, M., Gangooly, S., & Muttukrishna, S. (2011).The Normal Menstrual Cycle in Women. Animal Reproduction Science, 124 (3–4), 229–236.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.030
Ministerio de Salud. (1993, October 4). Resolución 008430. Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. DO. 49427. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430-DE-1993.PDF
Necka, E. A., Puts, D. A., Dimitroff, S. J., & Norman, G. J. (2016). Other Women’s Fertility Moderates Female Resource Distribution Across the Menstrual Cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37 (5), 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.03.003
Nikiforidis, L., Arsena, A. R., & Durante, K. M. (2017). The Effect of Fertility on Women’s Intrasexual Competition. In M. Fisher (Ed.), The oxford handbook of women and competition (1a, pp. 397–410). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.23
Patzer, G. L. (1985). The Physical Attractiveness Phenomena. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0202-6
Pearson, M., & Schipper, B. C. (2013). Menstrual Cycle and Competitive Bidding. Games and Economic Behavior, 78 (1), 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.008
Probst, F., Golle, J., Lory, V., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2018).Reactive Aggression Tracks Within-Participant Changes in Women’s Salivary Testosterone. Aggressive Behavior, 44 (4), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21757
Regan, P. C. (1996). Rhythms of Desire: The Association Between Menstrual Cycle Phases and Female Sexual Desire. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 5 (3), 145–156. https://doi.org/https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2s2.00030475027&partnerID=40&md5=5e06ac9b05b9d7150b6cf2c89d83a781
Rhode, D. L. (2010). The Beauty Bias: The Injustice of Appearance in Life and Law. Oxford University Press.
Rhodes, G. (2006). The Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57,199–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
Rodríguez Ruiz, C. (2019). Efecto de variables asociadas a hormonas sexuales en el comportamiento prosocial humano en distintos contextos experimentales. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Saad, G., & Stenstrom, E. (2012). Calories, Beauty, and Ovulation: The Effects of the Menstrual Cycle on Food and Appearance-Related Consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22 (1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.001
Schipper, B. C. (2015). Sex hormones and competitive bidding. Management Science, 61 (2), 249–266.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1959
Stanton, S. J. (2017). The Role of Testosterone and Estrogen in Consumer Behavior and Social & Economic Decision Making: A Review. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.11.006
Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous Consumption as a Sexual Signaling System. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100 (4), 664–680.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021669
Unesco. (2005). Declaración universal sobre bioética y derechos humanos. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000146180_spa
Van Damme, E., Binmore, K. G., Roth, A. E., Samuelson, L., Winter, E., Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A., Dufwenberg, M., Kirchsteiger, G., Gneezy, U., Kocher, M. G., Sutter, M., Sanfey, A. G.,Kliemt, H., Selten, R., Nagel, R., & Azar, O. H.(2014). How Werner Güth’s Ultimatum Game Shaped our Understanding of Social Behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 108, 292–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.10.014
Varella, M. A. C., Valentova, J. V., Fernández, A. M., & Fisher, M. L. (2015). Evolution of Artistic and Aesthetic Propensities Through Female Competitive Ornamentation. In M. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook ofWomen and Competition (pp.757–784). Oxford Library of Psychology.
Wilcox, A. J., Day Baird, D., Dunson, D. B., McConnaughey, D. R., Kesner, J. S., & Weinberg, C. R. (2004). On the Frequency of Intercourse around Ovulation: Evidence for Biological Influences. Human Reproduction, 19 (7), 1539–1543. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh305
Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D., & Baird, D. D. (2000). The Timing of the “fertile window” in the Menstrual Cycle: Day Specific Estimates from a Prospective Study. British Medical Journal, 321 (7271),1259–1262. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1259
Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D. B., Weinberg, C. R., Trussell, J., & Baird, D. D. (2001). Likelihood of Conception with a Single Act of Intercourse: Providing Benchmark Rates for Assessment of Post-Coital Contraceptives. Contraception, 63 (4), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00191-3
Zethraeus, N., Kocoska-Maras, L., Ellingsen, T., Schoultz, B., Hirschberg, A. L., & Johannesson, M. (2009). A Randomized Trial of the Effect of Estrogen and Testosterone on Economic Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (16), 6535–6538. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812757106
Zhuang, J.-Y., & Wang, J.-X. (2014). Women Ornament Themselves for Intrasexual Competition near Ovulation, but for Intersexual Attraction in Luteal Phase. PLoS ONE, 9 (9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106407
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Cited by
