Intraparietal sulcus activity during explicit self-referential social status judgments about others
PDF

Keywords

IPS
fMRI
social distance
social status
person perception

How to Cite

Cloutier, J., & Gyurovski, I. (2013). Intraparietal sulcus activity during explicit self-referential social status judgments about others. International Journal of Psychological Research, 6, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.721

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) supports judgments of social distance, with greater activity observed in response to targets judged to be closer to each other (Yamakawa, Kanai, Matsumura, & Naito, 2009). Amongst other stimuli, activity in the IPS appears to be responsive to targets varying in social status (Chiao et al., 2009; Cloutier, Ambady, Meagher, & Gabrieli, 2012). The current project examined brain responses during explicit self-referential social status judgments of targets varying in either financial or moral status. Using an event-related fMRI design, participants viewed photographs of male faces paired with distinct levels of financial or moral status. During the task, participants were asked to explicitly identify each target’s status in relation to their own. Focusing on IPS activity, results from whole-brain and region of interest analyses revealed an interaction between social status types and levels. The implications of these results are discussed with respect to our current understanding of the impact of social status on the neural substrates of person perception.
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.721
PDF

References

Akerlof, G. A. (1997). Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1005–1027.

Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 295–298.

Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch Jr, M. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 241–255.

Boehm, C. (2012). Ancestral hierarchy and conflict. Science, 336(6083), 844–847.

Bogardus E. S. (1959) Social Distance. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch.

Bottero, W., & Prandy, K. (2003). Social interaction distance and stratification. The British Journal of Sociology, 54(2), 177–197.

Boyce, W. T. (2004). Social stratification, health, and violence in the very young. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1036(1), 47–68.

Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2008). What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1), 29–35.

Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (2008). Baboon metaphysics: the evolution of a social mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Chiao, J. Y. (2010). Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species. Current opinion in neurobiology, 20(6), 803-809.

Chiao, J. Y., Bordeaux, A. R., & Ambady, N. (2004). Mental representations of social status. Cognition, 93(2), B49-B57.

Chiao, J. Y., Harada, T., Oby, E. R., Li, Z., Parrish, T., & Bridge, D. J. (2009). Neural representations of social status hierarchy in human inferior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 354–363.

Cloutier, J., Ambady, N., Meagher, T., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2012). The neural substrates of person perception: Spontaneous use of financial and moral status knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 50(9), 2371–2376.

Cloutier, J., Norman, G. J., Li, T., & Berntson, G. G. (2013). Person perception and autonomic nervous system response: The costs and benefits of possessing a high social status. Biological Psychology, 92(2), 301-305.

Cohen Kadosh, R., Cohen Kadosh, K., Kaas, A., Henik, A., & Goebel, R. (2007). Notation-dependent and-independent representations of numbers in the parietal lobes. Neuron, 53(2).

The work that is sent to this journal must be original, not published or sent to be published elsewhere; and if it is accepted for publication, authors will agree to transfer copyright to International Journal of Psychological Research. 

To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate. 

The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.