How to Cite
Honores Mendoza, L., & Merino Soto, C. (2011). Reliability of intellectual ability test, DAP: IQ. International Journal of Psychological Research, 4(2), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.779
License terms
The work that is sent to this journal must be original, not published or sent to be published elsewhere; and if it is accepted for publication, authors will agree to transfer copyright to International Journal of Psychological Research. 

To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate. 

The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.


The reliability of the scores of Draw-A-Person Intellectual Ability Test for Children, Adolescents and Adults, DAP: IQ is examined with a sample of 155 children aged 6 to 11 years. Alpha coefficients were obtained from 0.63 to 0.74, the average alpha for the total sample was 0.68; It also was the difference in alpha coefficients confirmed that the low reliability of all our data with regard to the normative study. The agreement interscorer was 0.91. The results were not consistent with those reported by the authors of the test. We suggest a cautious use of this instrument for the assessment of groups with similar characteristics.



Abell, S. C., Wood, W., & Liebman, S. J., (2001). Children’s human figure drawings as measures of intelligence:The comparative validity of three scoring systems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19(3), 204-215.
Aiken, R. L. (2000). Psychological testing and assessment (10a. ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allen and Bacon.
Anastasi, A. y Urbina, S. (1998). Test psicológicos (7a. ed.). Mexico: Prentice Hall.
Catte, M. & Cox, M. V. (1999). Emotional indicators in children’s human figure drawings. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 8(2), 86-91.
Cox, M. V. & Catte, M. (2000). Severely disturbed children’s human figure drawings: Are they unusual or just poor drawings? European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 9(4), 301-306.
Barnes, E. (1893). A study of children’s drawings. Pedagogical Seminary, 2, 416-451.
Bovan, J. & Craig, R. J. (2002). Validity of projective drawing indices of male homosexuality. Psychological Reports, 90(1), 175-183.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.


Download data is not yet available.

Cited by