Dimensions

PlumX

Cómo citar
Valquaresma, A., Coimbra, J. L., & Costa, P. (2022). Escala de Autoeficacia Creativa para niños y adolescentes (CASES): Un estudio de desarrollo y validación. International Journal of Psychological Research, 15(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5410
Términos de licencia
The work that is sent to this journal must be original, not published or sent to be published elsewhere; and if it is accepted for publication, authors will agree to transfer copyright to International Journal of Psychological Research. 

To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate. 

The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.

Resumen

La autoeficacia creativa (AC) se convirtió en uno de los constructos más discutidos de la educación. Sin embargo, los instrumentos para evaluarlo en niños y adolescentes son escasos. Este artículo presenta el proceso de desarrollo y validación inicial de CASES, una nueva medida de AC diseñada para esa populación.

Tras la concepción de los ítems, se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio. La estructura final es constituida por nueve ítems, distribuidos uniformemente por tres factores: fluidez, elaboración y personalidad. Los análisis preliminares de confiabilidad y validez muestran buenas propiedades psicométricas, destacando la CASES como una adición potencialmente relevante al conjunto de instrumentos de evaluación de la AC. Diseñada para niños y adolescentes (de 3 a 16 años), puede permitir un enfoque en el desarrollo de AC con posibles implicaciones educativas. Por consiguiente, podrá ser de interés para padres, educadores, psicólogos educativos, investigadores y políticos implicados en el diseño de currículos e intervenciones capaces de nutrir y mejorar el potencial creativo.

Palabras clave:

Referencias

Abbott, D. (2010). Constructing a creative self-efficacy inventory: A mixed-methods inquiry [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nebraska]. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1067&context=cehsdiss

Alotaibi, K. N. (2016). Psychometric Properties of Creative Self-Efficacy Inventory Among Distinguished Students in Saudi Arabian Universities. Psychological Reports, 118 (3), 902–917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116646021

Anderson, R. C., & Haney, M. (2020). Reflection in the creative process of early adolescents: The mediating roles of creative metacognition, self-efficacy, and self-concept. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15 (4), 612–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000324

Atwood-Blaine, D., Rule, A. C., & Walker, J. (2019). Creative self-efficacy of children aged 9-14 in a science center using a situated Mobile game. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100580

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 21–41.

Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307-337). Information Age Publishing.


Barbot, B., Lubart, T. I., & Besançon, M. (2016). “Peaks, Slumps, and Bumps”: Individual Differences in the Development of Creativity in Children and Adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016 (151), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20152

Batelle for Kids. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Batelle for Kids. https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources

Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18 (4), 447–457.

Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (2), 210–223.

Beghetto, R. A. (2014). Creative mortification: An initial exploration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8 (3), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036618

Beghetto, R. A., & Dilley, A. E. (2016). Creative aspirations or pipe dreams? Toward understanding creative mortification in children and adolescents. In B. Barbot (Ed.), Perspectives on creativity development (pp. 85–95). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In M. Karwowski & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 3–22). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00001-7

Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baxter, J. (2011). Answering the unexpected questions: Exploring the relationship between students’ creative self-efficacy and teacher ratings of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity, and the Arts, 5 (4), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022834

Benedek, M., Jung, R. E., & Vartanian, O. (2018). The neural bases of creativity and intelligence: Common ground and differences. Neuropsychologia, 118, 1–3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.09.006

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107 (2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Frontiers in public health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.) The Guilford Press.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9 (2), 233–255. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902

Corazza, G. E. (2017). Organic Creativity forWell-Being in the Post-Information Society. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13 (4), 599–605. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v13i4.1547

Craft, A. (2002). Creativity and Early Years Education. Continuum.

Dampérat, M., Jeannot, F., Jongmans, E., & Jolibert, A. (2016). Team creativity: Creative self-efficacy, creative collective efficacy and their determinants. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 31 (3), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051570716650164

Farmer, S., & Tierney, P. (2017). Considering creative self-efficacy: its current state and ideas for future inquiry. In M. Karwowski & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Creative Self: effects of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 23–47). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00002-9

Fino, E., & Sun, S. (2022). “Let us create!”: The mediating role of Creative Self-Efficacy between personality and Mental Well-Being in university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 188, 111444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111444

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.

Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29 (3), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515

Frith, E., Elbich, D. B., Christensen, A. P., Rosenberg, M. D., Chen, Q., Kane, M. J., Silvia, P. J., Seli, P., & Beaty, R. E. (2020). Intelligence and creativity share a common cognitive and neural basis. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 150 (4), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000958

Froman, R. D. (2001). Elements to consider in planning the use of factor analysis. Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research, 2 (5), 1–22. http://www.snrs.org/sojnr

Glăveanu, V. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49 (3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.94

Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of worldmaking. Hackett Publishing.

Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H. P., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Creative Self-Efficacy and Different Creativity
Measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30 (1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436

Hagger, M. S., Gucciardi, D. F., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2017). On Nomological Validity and Auxiliary Assumptions: The Importance of Simultaneously Testing Effects in Social Cognitive Theories Applied to Health Behavior and Some Guidelines. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1933. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01933

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babbin, B. A., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis. Cengage Learning.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.) SAGE.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Jaiswal, N. K., & Dhar, R. L. (2016). Fostering Employee CreativitythroughTransformational Leadership: Moderating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy. Creativity Research Journal, 28 (3), 367–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195631

Jaussi, K. S., Randel, A. E., & Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think, I can, I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19 (2–3), 247–258.

Jiang, J., & Yang, B. (2014). Does critical thinking lead to high creativity? The weakening effect of the leader-subordinate exchange in the Chinese context. Nankai Business Review, 17 (2), 117–128.

Joët, G., Usher, E. L., & Bressoux, P. (2011). Sources of self-efficacy: An investigation of elementary school students in France. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103 (3), 649–663.

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1981). LISREL V: analysis of Linear StructuralRelations By the Method of Maximum Likelihood. International Educational Services.

Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second-generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35 (4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817

Karwowski, M. (2012). Did Curiosity Kill the Cat? Relationship Between Trait Curiosity, Creative Self-Efficacy and Creative Personal Identity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8 (4), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v8i4.513

Karwowski, M., & Barbot, B. (2016). Creative self-beliefs: Their nature, development, and correlates. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Cambridge companion to reason and development (pp. 302–326). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139941969.016

Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creative Behavior as Agentic Action. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity, and the Arts, 13 (4), 402–415.
https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000190

Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., & Szumski, G. (2015). Teachers’ effect on students’ creative self-concept is moderated by students’ gender. Learning and Individual Differences. Advance online publication, 44, 1–8.

Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., & Beghetto, R. (2019). Creative Self-Beliefs. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 396–417). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.021

Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., & Wisniewska, E. (2012). Measurement of creative self-efficacy and creative role-identity. High Ability Studies, 22, 291–231.

Malik, M., Butt, A., & Choi, J. (2015). Rewards and employee creative performance: Moderating effects of creative self-eficacy, reward importance, and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 59–74.

Mathisen, G. E. (2011). Organizational antecedents of creative self-efficacy. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20 (3), 185–195.

Mathisen, G. E., & Bronnick, K. S. (2009). Creative Self-Efficacy: An intervention study. International Journal of Educational Research, 48, 21–29.

McKay, A. S., Lovelace, J. B., & Howard, M. C. (2018). The Heart of Innovation: Antecedents and Consequences of Creative Self-Efficacy in Organizations. In R. Reiter-Palmon, V. L. Kennel, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Individual Creativity in the Workplace (pp. 223–244). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813238-8.00010-3

McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23 (3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144

Nunnally, J., & Berstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill.

Ohly, S., Pluckthun, L., & Kissel, D. (2017). Developing Students’ Creative Self-Efficacy Based on Design-Thinking: Evaluation of an Elective University Course. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16 (1), 125–132.

Piaget, J. (1952). Origins of intelligence in the child. International Universities Press, Inc.

Piaget, J. (1978). La formation du symbole chez l’enfant: imitation, jeu et rêve, image et représentation (8eme ed.). Delacheux & Niestlé. http://www.fondationjeanpiaget.ch/fjp/site/textes/index_extraits_chrono3.php

Puente-Díaz, R. (2016). Creative Self-Efficacy: An Exploration of Its Antecedents, Consequences, and Applied Implications. The Journal of Psychology, 150 (2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1051498

Puente-Díaz, R., & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. (2018). An exploration of some antecedents and consequences of creative selfefficacy among college students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 52 (3), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.149

Puryear, J. S., Kettler, T., & Rinn, A. N. (2019). Relating Personality and Creativity: Considering What and How We Measure. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53 (2), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.174

Reise, S. P., Waller, N. G., & Comrey, A. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12 (3), 287–297.

Royston, R., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2017). Creative self-eficacy as mediator between creative mindsets and creative problem-solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53 (4), 472–481.

Shaw, A., Kapnek, M., & Morelli, N. A. (2021). Measuring Creative Self-Efficacy: An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Creative Self-Efficacy Scale. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 678033. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678033

Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1980). Statistical Methods (7th ed.) Iowa State University Press.

Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25 (2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.) Pearson.

Tan, A. G. (2007). Development of creativity efficacy scales. [Unpublished Manuscript]. Singapore: National Institute of Education.

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creativeperformance. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (8), 1137–1148.

Trizano-Hermosilla, I., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best Alternatives to Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 769–769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769

Tsang, S., Royse, C. F., & Terkawi, A. S. (2017). Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi journal of anaesthesia, 11, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17

Vally, Z., Salloum, L., AlQedra, D., El Shazly, S., Albloshi, M., Alsheraifi, S., & Alkaabi, A. (2019). Examining the effects of creativity training on creative production, creative self-efficacy, and neuro-executive functioning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.003

Valquaresma, A. (2020). Challenges of contemporaneity: What course to creativity? – Comprehensive exploration of the developmental role of creative self-efficacy, aesthetic judgment and schooling in creativity [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Porto]. https://hdl.handle.net/10216/131723

Valquaresma, A., & Coimbra, J. (2021). Searching for creativity in the Portuguese preschool and basic education curricula. The Curriculum Journal, 00, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.140

Valquaresma, A., & Coimbra, J. L. (2021). Creativity, learning and technology: Lights and insights for new worldmaking possibilities in education. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 8 (1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2021-0004

Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345

Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, (14), 361–384.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citado por