Una Una escala de respuesta de inconsistencia para el Cuestionario de Rasgos Psicopáticos Adaptativos de Durand
Autores/as
Guillaume Durand
Perfil Google Scholar
Ver/Descargar
PDF (English)
FLIP
Cómo citar
Durand, G. (2022). Una Una escala de respuesta de inconsistencia para el Cuestionario de Rasgos Psicopáticos Adaptativos de Durand. International Journal of Psychological Research, 15(2), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5524
Más formatos de cita
Términos de licencia
▼
The work that is sent to this journal must be original, not published or sent to be published elsewhere; and if it is accepted for publication, authors will agree to transfer copyright to International Journal of Psychological Research.
To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate.
The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.
To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate.
The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.
Resumen
Las respuestas descuidadas e inconsistentes son un problema común en los instrumentos de autoinforme, observado en aproximadamente el 10% de los encuestados. El propósito de este estudio fue desarrollar una Escala de Respuesta Inconsistente (IRS) para el Cuestionario de Rasgos Psicopáticos Adaptativos de Durand (DAPTQ). En primer lugar, se utilizó una muestra de derivación (N = 525) para desarrollar el IRS-DAPTQ, una escala que genera una puntuación total a partir de la diferencia absoluta de 12 pares de ítems con alta intra-correlación. En segundo lugar, se evaluó la validez del IRS-DAPTQ utilizando datos humanos (N = 943) que se generaron aleatoriamente (N = 1.000). El IRS-DAPTQ diferenció con éxito los datos humanos de los generados aleatoriamente. Las puntuaciones del IRS-DAPTQ mostraron una asociación negativa con la concienciación y tuvieron una mayor especificidad para una muestra de la población general reclutada en línea que para una muestra de estudiantes universitarios. Estos resultados apoyan la utilidad del IRS-DAPTQ para identificar a los individuos que muestran un estilo de respuesta inconsistente.
Palabras clave:
Referencias
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91 (4), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878
Bagby, R. M., & Sellbom, M. (2018). The Validity and Clinical Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 Response Inconsistency Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100 (4), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1420659
Berry, K., Rana, R., Lockwood, A., Fletcher, L., & Pratt, D. (2019). Factors associated with inattentive responding in online survey research. Personality and Individual Differences, 149 (June), 157–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.043
Bowling, N. A., Huang, J. L., Bragg, C. B., Khazon, S., Liu, M., & Blackmore, C. E. (2016). Who cares and who is careless? insufficient effort responding as a reflection of respondent personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000085
Bronchain, J., Chabrol, H., & Raynal, P. (2021). Adaptive psychopathic traits: Positive outcomes in a college student sample. Current Psychology, 40, 4997–5004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144019-00434-3
Bronchain, J., Raynal, P., & Chabrol, H. (2020). Heterogeneity of adaptive features among psychopathy variants. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11 (1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000366
Crowe, M. L., Weiss, B. M., Sleep, C. E., Harris, A. M., Carter, N. T., Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2021). Fearless Dominance/Boldness Is Not Strongly Related to Externalizing Behaviors: An Item Response-Based Analysis. Assessment, 28 (2), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120907959
Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006
Durand, G. (2019a). Incremental Validity of the Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Questionnaire Above Self-Report Psychopathy Measures in Community Samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101 (5), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1464456
Durand, G. (2019b). The adaptive side of psychopathy: Investigating adaptive characteristics associated with the psychopathic personality. Maastricht University.
Durand, G. (2019c). The Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Questionnaire: Development and Validation.
Journal of Personality Assessment, 101 (2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1372443
Huang, J. L., Liu, M., & Bowling, N. A. (2015). Insufficient effort responding: Examining an insidious confound in survey data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100 (3), 828–845. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038510
Kelley, S. E., Edens, J. F., Donnellan, M. B., Ruchensky, J. R., Witt, E. A., & McDermott, B. E. (2016). Development and validation of an inconsistent responding scale for an abbreviated version of the psychopathic personality inventory.
Revised. Personality and Individual Differences, 91 (March), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.033
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and Preliminary Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Psychopathic Personality Traits in Noncriminal Populations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66 (3), 488–524. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_3
Lilienfeld, S. O., Patrick, C. J., Benning, S. D., Berg, J., Sellbom, M., & Edens, J. F. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clarifications. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3 (3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026987
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. (2005). Psychopathic personality inventory-revised: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2012). An examination of the Psychopathic Personality Inventorys nomological network: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3 (3), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024567
Mowle, E. N., Kelley, S. E., Edens, J. F., Donnellan, M. B., Smith, S. T., Wygant, D. B., & Sellbom, M. (2017). Development of an Inconsistent Responding Scale for the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure. Psychological Assessment, 29 (8), 990–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000395
Patrick, C. (2010). Triarchic psychopathy measure (TriPM). PhenX Toolkit Online Assessment Catalog.
Bagby, R. M., & Sellbom, M. (2018). The Validity and Clinical Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 Response Inconsistency Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100 (4), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1420659
Berry, K., Rana, R., Lockwood, A., Fletcher, L., & Pratt, D. (2019). Factors associated with inattentive responding in online survey research. Personality and Individual Differences, 149 (June), 157–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.043
Bowling, N. A., Huang, J. L., Bragg, C. B., Khazon, S., Liu, M., & Blackmore, C. E. (2016). Who cares and who is careless? insufficient effort responding as a reflection of respondent personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000085
Bronchain, J., Chabrol, H., & Raynal, P. (2021). Adaptive psychopathic traits: Positive outcomes in a college student sample. Current Psychology, 40, 4997–5004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144019-00434-3
Bronchain, J., Raynal, P., & Chabrol, H. (2020). Heterogeneity of adaptive features among psychopathy variants. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11 (1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000366
Crowe, M. L., Weiss, B. M., Sleep, C. E., Harris, A. M., Carter, N. T., Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2021). Fearless Dominance/Boldness Is Not Strongly Related to Externalizing Behaviors: An Item Response-Based Analysis. Assessment, 28 (2), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120907959
Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006
Durand, G. (2019a). Incremental Validity of the Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Questionnaire Above Self-Report Psychopathy Measures in Community Samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101 (5), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1464456
Durand, G. (2019b). The adaptive side of psychopathy: Investigating adaptive characteristics associated with the psychopathic personality. Maastricht University.
Durand, G. (2019c). The Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Questionnaire: Development and Validation.
Journal of Personality Assessment, 101 (2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1372443
Huang, J. L., Liu, M., & Bowling, N. A. (2015). Insufficient effort responding: Examining an insidious confound in survey data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100 (3), 828–845. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038510
Kelley, S. E., Edens, J. F., Donnellan, M. B., Ruchensky, J. R., Witt, E. A., & McDermott, B. E. (2016). Development and validation of an inconsistent responding scale for an abbreviated version of the psychopathic personality inventory.
Revised. Personality and Individual Differences, 91 (March), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.033
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and Preliminary Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Psychopathic Personality Traits in Noncriminal Populations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66 (3), 488–524. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_3
Lilienfeld, S. O., Patrick, C. J., Benning, S. D., Berg, J., Sellbom, M., & Edens, J. F. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clarifications. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3 (3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026987
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. (2005). Psychopathic personality inventory-revised: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2012). An examination of the Psychopathic Personality Inventorys nomological network: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3 (3), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024567
Mowle, E. N., Kelley, S. E., Edens, J. F., Donnellan, M. B., Smith, S. T., Wygant, D. B., & Sellbom, M. (2017). Development of an Inconsistent Responding Scale for the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure. Psychological Assessment, 29 (8), 990–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000395
Patrick, C. (2010). Triarchic psychopathy measure (TriPM). PhenX Toolkit Online Assessment Catalog.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citado por
