PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
HTML (Español (España))
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT
Assignment of Rights
Authorization for reproduction, publication, communication and distribution of a literary, artistic or scientific
Work.
I , ____________________________________________, author of the book and / or article , of legal age , resident of the city of _________________ , identified with citizenship / passport n° ______________________ issued on _______________________, in exercise of his physical and mental faculties , part henceforth be called the AUTHOR , supports the following authorization to the reproduction, publication, communication and distribution of a work, perform the following terms:
1. Regardless of current legal regulations due to the linking of the parties to this contract, and any kind of legal presumption , the parties agree that the AUTHOR authorize ( name of the publisher ) to reproduce , publish , communicate and distribute the material referred to in the International Journal of Cooperation and Development of the University of San Buenaventura.
2. Such authorization lies in particular on the copyright of the work, by any means known or unknown, publication of the work, distribution of the work , either directly or through third parties for purely educational purposes.
3. AUTHOR agrees to report and declare the existence of this authorization and to preserve the right of the International Journal of Cooperation and Development of the first publication of the work.
4. AUTHOR declares that the article is original and that it is his sole creation, no impediment of any kind exist for the authorization he is doing, besides being responsible for any action claim, plagiarism or other type of claim that might arise about .
5. Such permission is free of charge.
6. Moral copyright in the article are solely the AUTHOR and the University of San Buenaventura expressly agrees to recognize and respect them rigorously.
The Author and / or AUTHORS
SIGNATURE
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to review critically the role of freedom as a determinant of subjective well-being throughout the process of human development, understood in the sociological sense of the post-materialist theory of modernization. Although the legitimacy of using subjective information from surveys to measure human development has been questioned by the problem of adaptive preferences, rejecting it in principle to explain well-being is contradictory with the foundational premise of the human development paradigm, given his irreducible defense of individual agency.
The starting hypothesis is that the literature of development studies that seeks to explain the variation of subjective well-being in the human development process tends to reduce freedom of choice, such as negative freedom (non-interference), to consumer economic freedom, which leads to false tracks and Eurocentric biases.
The conclusion of the review is that it is necessary to recover the integral concept of freedom, as positive freedom or self-realization, associated with the Aristotelian-Marxist-Polanyian tradition, which links to the original approach of Amartya Sen.
References
Berlin, I. ([1998] 2002). Final retrospect, en H. Hardy, ed., Liberty, incorportating Four Essays in Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 322-330.
Berlin, I. ([2002] 2014). Freedom and Its Betrayal. Six Enemies of Human Liberty. Princenton: Princenton University Press.
Beytía, P. (2016). The Singularity of Latin American Patterns of Happiness, en M. Rojas, ed., Handbook of Happiness Research in Latin America. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 17-30.
Bjerke, A.R. (2012). Modernization, en M. Juergensmeyer y W.C. Roof, eds., Encyclopedia of Global Religion. Los Angeles: SAGE, vol. 2, pp. 810-813.
Boltvinik, J. (2008a). Evaluación crítica del enfoque de «capabilities» de Amartya Sen (Primera Parte), Mundo Siglo XXI, 12, pp. 43-55.
Boltvinik, J. (2008b). Evaluación crítica del enfoque de «capabilities» de Amartya Sen (Segunda Parte), Mundo Siglo XXI, 13, pp. 19-41.
Burns, T. (2016). «Happy slaves»? The adaptation problema and identity politics in the writings of Amartya Sen. International Journal of Social Economics, 43(12), pp. 1178-193.
Cano, M. (2017). Agencia crítica y desposesión. La actualidad de la pregunta por la libertad en Judith Butler. Isegoría. Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política, 56, pp. 263-277.
Cartocci, R. (2011). Political Culture, en B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser y L. Morlino, eds., International Encyclopedia of Political Science. Los Angeles: SAGE, vol. 6, pp. 1967-1979.
Casassas, D. (2008). En torno a las condiciones materiales de la libertad: la renta básica como fundamento de la sociedad civil. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía, 34(1), pp. 134-157.
Casassas, D. (2018). Para la constitución de la república contemporánea: entrevista a David Casassas, Recuperado de: http://www.sinpermiso.info/textos/para-la-constitucion-politica-de-la-republica-contemporanea-entrevista-a-david-casassas [consulta 20 de diciembre de 2018].
Croker, D.A. & I. Robeyns (2010): Capability and Agency, en C.W. Morris, ed., Amartya Sen, Nueva York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60-90.
Dang, A.T. (2014). Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: A Framework from Well-Being Evaluation and Policy Analysis? Review of Social Economy, 72(4), pp. 460-484.
Degli Esposti, P. (2012). Hyperconsumption, en G. Ritzer, ed., The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Dobbelaere, K. (2007). Secularization, en G. Ritzer, ed., The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 4148-4156.
Düzenli, F.E. (2016). Surplus-producing labour as capability: a Marxian contribution to Amartya Sen’s revival of political economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(4), pp. 1019-1035.
Fokas, E. (2012): Secularization, en M. Juergensmeyer y W.C. Roof, eds., Encyclopedia of Global Religion. Los Angeles: SAGE, vol. 2, pp. 1143-1145.
Frey, B.S. & A. Stulzer (2000). Happiness, Economy and Institutions. The Economic Journal, 110, pp. 918-938.
Friedman, M. & R. Friedman ([1962] 2002). Capitalism and Freedom. 40th Anniversary Edition With a new Preface by the Author, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, M. & R. Friedman (1980). Free to Choose, Nueva York: HBJ.
Fromm, E. ([1941] 2005). El miedo a la libertad, Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Gilovich, T. (1991). How We Know What Isn’t So. The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life, Nueva York: The Free Press.
Gundlach, E. & M. Opfinger (2013). Religiosity as a Determinant of Hapiness. Review of Development Economics, 17(3), pp. 523-539.
Hayek, F.A. von ([1938] 1940). La libertad y el sistema económico. El Trimestre Económico, 6(24-4), pp. 666-700.
Hayek, F.A. von ([1944] 2001). The Road to Serfdom, Londres, Routledge.
Helliwell, J.F., H. Huang & S. Wang (2017). The Social Foundations of World Hapiness, en J.F. Heliwell, R. Layard & J. Sachs, eds., World Happiness Report 2017, Nueva York, Sustainable Development Solutions Network, pp. 8-47.
Hjelm, T. (2012). Desecularization, en M. Juergensmeyer & W.C. Roof, eds., Encyclopedia of Global Religion. Los Angeles, SAGE, vol. 1, pp. 293-294.
Hirai, T., F. Comin, y Y. Ikemoto (2016). Happiness and human development: A capability perspective. Journal of Human Development, 28(7), pp. 1155-1169.
Hojman, D.A. & A. Miranda (2018). Agency, Human Dignity, and Subjective Well-being. World Development, 101, pp. 1-15.
Honneth, A. (2006). El reconocimiento como ideología. Isegoría. Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política, 35, pp. 129-150.
Horkheimer, M. ([1962] 1986). Sobre el concepto de libertad, en M. Horkheimer, Sociedades en transición: estudios de filosofía social. Barcelona: Planeta-DeAgostini, pp. 11-20.
Inglehart, R. & C. Welzel (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, R. & C. Welzel (2007). Modernization, en G. Ritzer, ed. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 3071-3078.
Inglehart, R. et al. (2008). Development, Freedom, and Rising Happiness. A Global Perspective (1981-2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), pp. 264-285.
Keucheyan, R. (2016). Las mutaciones de la teoría crítica. Un mapa del pensamiento radical hoy. Nueva Sociedad, 261, pp. 37-53.
Kingdon, G.G. & J. Knight (2006). Subjective Well-Being Poverty vs. Income Poverty and Capabilities Poverty? Journal of Development Studies, 42(7), pp. 1199-1224.
Klein, M. (2011). Postmaterialism, en B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser & L. Morlino, eds., International Encyclopedia of Political Science, Los Angeles, SAGE, vol. 6, pp. 2093-2095.
Knutsen, O. (2011): Values, en B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser & L. Morlino, eds., International Encyclopedia of Political Science, Los Angeles, SAGE, vol. 8, pp. 2691-2697.
Kramer, M.H. (2011). Liberty, en B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser & L. Morlino, eds., International Encyclopedia of Political Science, Los Angeles, SAGE, vol. 5, pp. 1447-1458.
Kukathas, C. (2007). Liberty, en R.E. Goodin, P. Pettit & T. Pogge, eds., A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 2, pp. 685-698.
Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and reality: Economics as social theory. Londres y Nueva York, Routledge.
Lebowitz, M.A. (2010). The Socialist Alternative. Real Human Development. Nueva York, Monthly Review Press.
Marcuse, H. ([1964] 2002). One-Dimensional Man. Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Nueva York, Routledge.
Markus, H.R. & B. Schwartz (2010). Does Choice Mean Freedom and Well-Being?, Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), pp. 344-355.
Marx, K. ([1867] 1996). Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Volume I, en K. Marx & F. Engels, Collected Works, Nueva York, Progress Publishers, vol. 35.
Marx, K. ([1894] 1998). Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Volume III, en K. Marx & F. Engels, Collected Works. Nueva York, Progress Publishers, vol. 37.
Matusitz, J. (2012). Cathedrals of consumption, en G. Ritzer, ed., The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.
Müller, T., N.D. De Graaf, & P. Schmidt. (2014). Which Societies Provide a Strong Religious Socialization Context? Explanations Beyond the Effects of National Religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(4), pp. 739-760.
Norris, P. & R. Inglehart (2011). Sacred and Secular. Religion and Politics Worldwide. Nueva York, Cambridge University Pres.
Otano, G. (2015). La libertad como relación social: una interpretación sociológica del enfoque de las capacidades de Amartya Sen. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios del Desarrollo, 4(1), pp. 98-127.
Pereira, G. (2008). Preferencias adaptativas: un desafío para el diseño de las políticas sociales, Isegoría. Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política, 36, pp. 143-165.
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. (2009). De la República a la Democracia. Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político, 4, pp. 47-68.
Pettit, P. (2010). Feedom in the Spirit of Sen, en C.W. Morris, ed., Amartya Sen. Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 91-114.
Pettit, P. (2012). On the People’s Terms. A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Pettit, P. (2016). A Brief History of Liberty And Its Lessons. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(1), pp. 5-21.
Polanyi, K. ([1944] 2001). The Great Transformation. Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Boston, Beacon Press.
Rojas, M. (2016). Happiness, Research, and Latin America, en M. Rojas, ed., Handbook of Happiness Research in Latin America, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 1-13.
Ryan, R.M. & E.L. Deci. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation fo Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psycologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Sartori, G. ([1997] 2005). Homo videns. La sociedad teledirigida. Madrid: Punto de Lectura.
Sen, A.K. (1983). Development: Which Way Now. The Economic Journal, 372, pp.745-762.
Sen, A.K. (1985). Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Letures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), pp. 169-221.
Sen, A.K. (1993). La libertad positiva. Entrevista con Amartya Kumar Sen, Debats, 43/44, pp. 77-83.
Sen, A.K. (1999). Development as Freedom. Nueva York, Alfred A. Knopf.
Sen, A.K. (2009). The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Skinner, Q. (2002). A Third Concept of Liberty. Isaiah Berlin Lecture. Proceedings of British Academy, 117, pp. 237-268.
Steinmetz, G. (1998). Critical Realism and Historical Sociology. A Review Article, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 40(1), pp. 170-186.
Stewart, F. (2014). Against Happiness: A Critical Appraisal of the use of measures of Happiness or evaluation progress in development, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(4), pp. 239-307.
Stoltz, J. (2008). Explaining religiosity: towards a unified theoretical model, The British Journal of Sociology, 60(2), pp. 345-376.
Verme, P. (2009). Happiness, freedom and control, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2), pp. 146-161.
Volpe, T. (2010). Modernization Theory, en M. Bevir, ed., Encyclopedia of Political Thought, Londres, Sage, pp. 895-899.
Welzel, C. (2011). “Human Development”, en B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser & L. Morlino, eds., International Encyclopedia of Political Science, Los Angeles, SAGE, vol. 4 , pp. 1101-1104.
Žižek, S. (2008). The Sublime Object of Ideology, Nueva York: Verso.
Downloads
Cited by
