Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite
Navarro, M. C., Quiroz Molinares, N., & Mebarak, M. (2022). Psychometric Study of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory in a Colombian Sample. International Journal of Psychological Research, 15(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5371
License terms
The work that is sent to this journal must be original, not published or sent to be published elsewhere; and if it is accepted for publication, authors will agree to transfer copyright to International Journal of Psychological Research. 

To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate. 

The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.

Abstract

Introduction: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted to evaluate the factor structure of Spanish translation and adaptation of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI) in a sample of Colombian adults. Method: The sample of the study was n = 968. Respondents were aged between 18 and 52 years old (Mage=22.81, SD=4.42). Descriptive analyses, confirmatory factor analysis, and Cronbach’s Alpha calculation were carried out. Results: Internal consistency for the global scale was high (α=.89). Likewise, the coefficients of the Alternative factor and the Control factor were similar (α=.90, 95% CI=.89–.90 and α=.83, 95% CI=.81–.85, respectively). A two-factor structure performed best according to the results of model selection criteria. This model suggested the existence of two correlated factors, with correlated items within factors (Item19∼Item20 and Item8∼Item10). Conclusions: Overall, the results suggest that the CFI scale exhibits construct validity and adequate reliability, both for the general scale and the subscales in the Colombian sample, enabling their use in contexts such as clinical or research.

Keywords:

References

Angosto, J., & Martínez, C. (2004). Dimensions and Determinants of the Contact Intention toward Outgroups. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 38, 181–190.

Bandalos, D. L. (2014). Relative Performance of Categorical Diagonally Weighted Least Squares and Robust Maximum Likelihood Estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.859510

Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. H. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78–117.

Brewster, M. E., Moradi, B., DeBlaere, C., & Velez, B. L. (2013). Navigating the Borderlands: The Roles of Minority Stressors, Bicultural Self-Efficacy, and Cognitive Flexibility in the Mental Health of Bisexual Individuals. Journal of counseling psychology, 60 (4), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033224

Caldwell, W., Mcinnis, O. A., Mcquaid, R. J., Liu, G., Stead, J. D., Anisman, H., & Hayley, S. (6). The Role of the Val66Met Polymorphism of the Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene in Coping Strategies Relevant to Depressive Symptoms, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065547

Cangur, S., & Ercan, I. (2015). Comparison of Model Fit Indices Used in Structural Equation Modeling Under Multivariate Normality, 14 (1), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1430453580

Cardom, R. D. (2016). The Mediating Role of Cognitive Flexibility on the Relationship between Cross-Race Interactions and Psychological Well-Being [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky]. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/edp_etds/50/

Cheng, C., Lau, H. P., & Chan, M. P. (2014). Coping flexibility and psychological adjustment to stressful life changes: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140 (6), 1582–1607. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037913

Cheng-Hsien, L. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7

Crisp, R. J., & Turner, R. N. (2011). Cognitive Adaptation to the Experience of Social and Cultural Diversity. Psychological Bulletin, 137 (2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021840

Dajani, D. R., & Uddin, L. Q. (2015). Demystifying cognitive flexibility: Implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience. Trends in Neuroscience, 38 (9), 571–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2015.07.003

Daugherty, J. C., Pérez-García, M., Hidalgo-Ruzzante, N., & Bueso-Izquierdo, N. (2020). Perceived Executive Functioning among Female Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 00 (00), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2020.1783734

Demirtas, A. S., & Yildiz, B. (2019). Hopelessness and perceived stress: The mediating role of cognitive flexibility and intolerance of uncertainty. Neurological Sciences, 32, 259–267. https://doi.org/10.14744/DAJPNS.2019.00035

Dennis, J. P., & Vander Wal, J. S. (2010). The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Eldesouky, L., & English, T. (2018). Another year older, another year wiser? Emotion regulation strategy selection and flexibility across adulthood. Psychology and aging, 33 (4), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000251

Enesco, I., Guerrero, S., Solbes, I., Lago, O., & Rodríguez, P. (2014). Ethnic-racial prejudice: A review of developmental research in Spain with Spanish and foreign children and preadolescents. Culture and Education, 21 (4), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1174/113564009790002427

Escobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). Content validity by experts judgment: Proposal for a virtual tool. Avances en Medición, 6, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.32870/ap.v9n2.993

Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (1), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150

Fresco, D. M., Rytwinski, N. K., & Craighead, L. W. (2007). Explanatory flexibility and negative life events interact to predict depression symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26 (5), 595–608. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2007.26.5.595

Fu, F., & Chow, A. (2017). Traumatic Exposure and PsychologicalWell-Being: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Flexibility. Journal ofLoss andTrauma, 22 (1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2016.1161428

Gioia, G., Isquith, P., Guy, S., & Kenworthy, L. (2000). Behavior Rating Inventory of executive Function. Professional manual. Psychological assessment resources.

González-Consuegra, V., R, & Verdú, J. (2010). Spanish adaptation process of the Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire (CCVUQ) to measure the quality of life related to health in patients with venous ulcers. Gerokomos, 21 (2), 80–87.

Góralska, K., & Basiska, M. A. (2019). Resiliency as a predictor of flexibility in coping with stress of cardiac patients. Health Psychology Report, 7 (3), 2353–5571. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2019.85952

Hambleton, R. K., & Zenisky, A. (2010). Translating and adapting tests for crosscultural assessments. In D. R. Matsumoto & F. J. Vijver (Eds.), Crosscultural research methods in psychology (pp. 46–74). Cambridge University Press.

Heaton, S. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., & Curtiss, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual: Revised and Expanded. Psychological Assessment Resources.

Herrero, J. (2010). Confirmatory Factor Analysis in the study of the Structure and Stability of Assessment Instruments: An example with the Self-Esteem Questionnaire (CA-14). Psychosocial Intervention, 19 (3), 289–300.

Ionescu, T. (2017). The variability-stability-flexibility pattern: A possible key to understanding the flexibility of the human mind. Review of General Psychology, 21, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000110

Kato, T. (2012). Development of the Coping Flexibility Scale: Evidence for the Coping Flexibility Hypothesis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59 (2), 262–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027770

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principals and Practice of StructuralEquation Modeling (Fourth Edition). The Guilford Press.

Koesten, J., Schrodt, P., & Ford, D. J. (2009). Cognitive flexibility as a mediator of family communication environments and young adults' wellbeing. Health Communication, 24, 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230802607024

Kruczek, A., Basiska, M. A., & Janicka, M. (2020). Cognitive flexibility andflexibility in coping innurses – the moderating role of age, seniority and the sense of stress. International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health, 33 (4), 507–521. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01567

Kurginyan, S. S., & Osavolyuk, E. Y. (2018). Psychometric Properties of a Russian Version of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI-R). Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00845

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130

MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490–504.

Maddio, S. L., & Greco, C. (2010). Flexibilidad Cognitiva para Resolver Problemas entre Pares ¿Difiere esta Capacidad en Escolares de Contextos Urbanos y Urbanomarginales? Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 44 (1), 98–109.

McDonald, J. D. (2008). Measuring personality constructs: The advantages and disadvantages of self-reports, informant reports and behavioural assessments. Enquire, 1 (1), 1–19.

Ministerio de Salud. (1993, October 4). Resolución 00843 de 1993 [Resolution 008430 of 1993. Establishing scientific, technical and administrative standards for health research]. Ministerio de Salud. https://www.urosario.edu.co/Escuela-Medicina/Investigacion/Documentos-de-interes/Files/resolucion_008430_1993.pdf

Moore, A., & Malinowski, P. (2009). Meditation, mindfulness and cognitive flexibility. Conscious and Cognition, 18 (1), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.12.008

Morata, M., Holgado, F. P., Barbero, I., & Méndez, G. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis. Recommendations for unweighted least squares method related to Chi-Square and RMSEA Type I error. Acción Psicológica, 12 (1), 79–90. https://dx.doi.org/doi.org/10.5944/ap.12.1.14362

Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Ronald, K. (2013). Guidelines for translation and adaptation of tests: Second edition. Psicothema, 25 (2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24

Muyan-Yilik, M., & Demir, A. A. (2020). Pathway Towards Subjective Well-Being for Turkish University Students: The Roles of Dispositional Hope,
Cognitive Flexibility, and Coping Strategies. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 1945–1963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00162-2

Navarro, M. C., & Mebarak, M. (2014). Formation of Social Prejudice, A Review from the Cognitive and Psychoanalytic Unconscious. Cuadernos de Neuropsicología, 8 (1), 88–106.

Nweze, T., Agu, E., & Lange, F. (2020). Risky decision making and cognitive flexibility among online sports bettors in Nigeria. International Journal of Psychology, 55 (6), 995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12663

Odac, H., & Cikrikci, Ö. (2019). Cognitive Flexibility Mediates the Relationship between Big Five Personality Traits and Life Satisfaction. Applied Research Quality Life, 14, 1229–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9651-y

Palm, K. M., & Follette, V. M. (2011). The roles of cognitive flexibility and experiential avoidance in explaining psychological distress in survivors of interpersonal victimization. Joumal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 33, 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-010-9201-x

Reitan, R., & Wolfson, D. (1993). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychologic Test Battery: Theory and Clinical Interpretation. Neuropsychology Press.

Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modelling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48 (2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Rudnik, A., Piotrowicz, G., Basiska, M. A., & Rashedi, V. (2019). The importance of cognitive flexibility and flexibility in coping with stress for the quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease patients during biological therapy. A preliminary report. Gastroenterology Review, 14 (2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2018.81081

Schulz, W., Ainley, J., & Fraillon, J. (Eds.) (2011). ICCS 2009 technical report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

Shah, D. (2019). Moderators of bicultural self-efficacy and mental health among Asian Americans [Doctoral thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks]. http://hdl.handle.net/11122/10640

Shapero, B. G., Greenberg, J., Mischoulon, D., Pedrelli, P., Meade, K., & Lazar, S. W. (2018). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Improves Cognitive Functioning and Flexibility Among Individuals with Elevated Depressive Symptoms. Mindfulness, 9, 1457–1469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0889-0

Shareh, H., Farmani, A., & Soltani, E. (2014). Investigating the Reliability and Validity of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI-I) among Iranian University Students. Practice in Clinical Psychology, 2 (1), 43–50. http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-163-en.html

Stemme, A., Deco, G., & Busch, A. (2007). The neuronal dynamics underlying cognitive flexibility in set shifting tasks. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 23 (3), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-007-0034-x

The R Foundation. (2019). The R project for statistical computing [Computer software]. The R Foundation. https://www.r-project.org/

Van Stockum, C. A. J., & De Caro, M. S. (2020). When working memory mechanisms compete: Predicting cognitive flexibility versus mental set. Cognition, 201, 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104313

Wadsworth, M., Rieckmann, T., Benson, M., & Compas, B. (2004). Coping and responses to stress in Navajo adolescents: Psychometric properties of the Responses to Stress Questionnaire. Journal of Community Psychology, 32 (4), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20008

Webler, R. D., Fulton, S., Perera, T. D., & Coplan, J. D. (2019). Maturational phase of hippocampal neurogenesis and cognitive flexibility. Neuroscience Letters, (711). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134414

Whittaker, T. A. (2012). Using the Modification Index and Standardized Expected Parameter Change for Model Modification. Journal of Experimental Education, 80 (1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.531299

Zaehringer, J., Falquez, R., Schubert, A. L., Nees, F., & Barnow, S. (2018). Neural correlates of reappraisal considering working memory capacity and cognitive flexibility. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 12 (6), 1529–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-017-9788-6

Zuo, B.,Wen, F.,Wang, M., &Wang, Y. (2019). The mediating role of cognitive flexibility in the influence of counter-stereotypes on creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00105

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Cited by

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
9%
33%
Days to publication 
388
145
Editor & editorial board
profiles
Publisher 
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)