Facilitation of equivalence – equivalence responding: generalization of relational responses


analogical reasoning
matching to sample
compound stimuli

How to Cite

Perez, V., Garcia, A., & Gomez, J. (2011). Facilitation of equivalence – equivalence responding: generalization of relational responses. International Journal of Psychological Research, 4(2), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.774


Equivalence-equivalence responding (Eq-Eq) has become a behaviour analytic model of analogical reasoning. In previous works it was demonstrated that the exposition to a non-arbitrary relational task (facilitation procedure) improves performance in Eq-Eq tasks. In the present work we attempted to analyze the role of task components: arbitrary or non-arbitrary relational responses, role as sample or comparisons, and relating relations. In the first experiment, we devised four facilitation procedures combining two dimensions: simple or compound sample or comparisons and arbitrary or non-arbitrary relations among compound stimuli. In the second experiment two facilitation procedures including compound stimuli were tested. In one condition arbitrary relations worked as sample, and non-arbitrary relations as comparison. In the other condition its function was reversed. All procedures were effective to improve Eq-Eq to different extents, being arbitrary relational responses the key element. These results show generalization between non-arbitrary and arbitrary responses, and add further support to Eq-Eq responding as operant behaviour.


Bohórquez, C., García, A., Gutiérrez, M. T., Gómez, J., y Pérez, V. (2002). Efecto del entrenamiento en reflexividad y la evaluación de equivalencia en la competencia entre relaciones arbitrarias y no arbitrarias en el paradigma equivalencia-equivalencia. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 2(1), 41-56.

Cabello, F., Luciano, C., Gomez, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Human schedule performance, protocol analysis, and the 'silent dog' methodology. The Psychological Record, 54(3), 405-422.

Carpentier, F., Smeets, P. M., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2002). Matching functionally same relations: Implications for equivalence-equivalence as a model for analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 52(3), 351-370.

Carpentier, F., Smeets, P. M., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Equivalence-equivalence as a model of analogy: Further analyses. Psychological Record, 53(3), 349-371.

The work that is sent to this journal must be original, not published or sent to be published elsewhere; and if it is accepted for publication, authors will agree to transfer copyright to International Journal of Psychological Research. 

To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate. 

The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.