Análisis al futuro de las arquitecturas de internet

Shpetimi Latifis

doi:10.21500/20275846.244

Submitted: 2015-04-09

Published: 2011-06-30

DOI: 10.21500/20275846.244

Análisis al futuro de las arquitecturas de internet

Shpetimi Latifis

Purdue University

View/Download

PDF (Español (España))

FLIP

Dimensions

PlumX

Doi

https://doi.org/10.21500/20275846.244

Issue: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2011): Ingenierías USBMed

How to Cite

Latifis, S. (2011). Análisis al futuro de las arquitecturas de internet. Ingenierías USBmed, 2(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.21500/20275846.244

More Citation Formats

ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

License terms ▼

This journal provides immediately free access to its contents under the principle that make available the research results for free to the public, helps for a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Therefore, the journal invokes the Creative Commons 4.0

License attributions: Recognition – Non-commertial - Share equal. Commercial use and distribution of original or derivative works are not permitted and must be done with a equal license as the one that regulate the original work.

Abstract

Debatir acerca del futuro de los desarrollos más importantes de la ingeniería actual es necesario. Internet es uno de esos desarrollos, por lo tanto necesita discusiones continuas. En este artículo se discute acerca la investigación del futuro de la arquitectura de internet, básicamente en dos corrientes: la de borrón y cuenta nueva, en la que se propone crear una nueva arquitectura, y la de investigación evolutiva, que propone mejorar la arquitectura actual.

References

W. B. Arthur. “Competing Technologies and Lock-In by Historical Small Events: The Dynamics of Allocation Under Increasing Returns”. Discussion Paper 43. Center for Econopmics Policy Research. Stanford Univesity. 1985.

Chakravarty S. “Experimental evidence on product adoption in the presence of network externalities”. Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 23, No. 3-4, pp. 233-254. 2003.

D. Fudenberg & J. Tirole. “Pricing a network good to deter entry”. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 373-390. 2000.

E. R. Berndt, Z. Griliches & N. J. Rappaport. “Econometric estimates of price indexes for personal computers in the 90s”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 241-257. 1995.

J. M. Gallaugher & Y. Wang. “Understanding network effect in software markets: evidence from web server pricing”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 303-327. 2002.

B. W. Arthur. “Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events”. The Economic Journal, Vol. 99, No. 394, pp. 116-131. 1989.

C. Dovrolis & T. Streelman. “Evolvable network architectures: What can we learn from biology?” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review, Vol. 40, No. 2. 2010.

C. L. Webb. “Brussels Sprouts a Microsoft Ruling”, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/ A59710-2004Mar15.html. [Sept. 2010].