PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
The authors are also adhere to the creative commons license 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es)
Attribution - NonCommercial - SinDerivar 4.0 International (CC BY - NC - ND 4.0)
Abstract
The assessment questionnaires are basic tools used in research or in programs geared to the early, simple, and fast detection of a sickness in the general population, with a high level of accepted reliability and validity. Objective: to determine the reliability of an assessment questionnaire dealing with learning disabilities; which makes easy the detection of children who are more likely to have learning disabilities. Patients and Methods: a random sample of 681 children was chosen; they belonged to the 3rd and 4th socio-economic strata, aged 8 and 11, of primary basic schooling education, from 4 educational institutions of a neighboring village of the Metropolitan Area of Medellin and who willingly decided to participate in the study. From this population, a non-random sample of 80 individuals was taken who met the inclusion criteria to carry out a pilot test. The questionnaire comprises 39 items comprising 8 frequent areas of difficulties. It is designed to assess the cognitive and language processes.
Keywords:
References
Bravo, L . (1979). Cuestionario de evaluación de problemas de aprendizaje CEPA. Estudio Pedagógico, 4, 113 - 123
Hintze, j.m; Ryan, A.L & stoner, G. ( 2003). Concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy of the dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills and the comprehensive test of phonological
processing. School psychology review, 32 (4), 541-557
Hurford, D.P, Potter, T,s & hart, G,s. (2002). Examination of three techniques for identifying first grade. Children at risk for difficulty in word identification with an emphasis on reducing the
false negative error rate. Reading. Psychology, 23, 159
Maglio Norma B. (2007). El desempeño de niños preescolares en una prueba de screening de habilidades y conocimientos prelectores. Facultad de Psicología U.N.L.P. RIDEP · Nº 24 ·
Vol. 2 · · 139 – 149. Argentina. E mail: jgaimaro@ciudad.com.ar
Sofie, C.A y Riccio, C.A ( 2002). A comparison of multiple methods for the identification of children with reading disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 35 (3) 234-244.
Risueño A, Motta I. (2005). Trastornos específicos del aprendizaje. Una mirada neuropsicológica. Buenos Aires: Bonum.
Ygual-Fernández A, Cervera-Mérida JF. (2001). Valoración del riesgo de dificultades de aprendizaje de la lectura en niños con trastornos del lenguaje. Rev Neurol Clin, 2 (1): 95-106.
Magaña Hernández, M. Dificultades escolares. Abordaje pediátrico. En Muñoz Calvo MT, Hidalgo Vicario MI, Rubio Roldan LA, Clemente.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional (2006): Orientaciones pedagógicas para la atención a estudiantes con necesidades educativas especiales. Serie Colombia Aprende. Bogotá,
Ministerio de Educación Nacional.
Pollán J, eds. (2001). Pediatría extrahospitalaria. Aspectos básicos en Atención Primaria. Madrid: Ergón, p. 437-42.
Rafoth, B. (1985). “Audience Adaptation in the Essays of Proficient and Non-proficient Freshman Writers”, Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 3, pp. 237-253.
Rutter, M., Yule, B., Quinton, D Rowlands, O., Yule, W. y Berger, M. (1975b) Attainment and adjustment in two geographical areas: lll. Some factors accounting for area differences.
British journal of Psychiatry, 126,520-533.
Salvesen K. A. ; Undheim, J. O. ; (1994). Screening for learning disabilities with teacher rating scales. Journal of learning disabilities. ISSN: 0022-2194 CODEN JLDIAD Source / Source1994, vol. 27, no1, pp. 60-66 (27 ref.)
Downloads
Cited by
