To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate.
The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.
Careless and inconsistent responding is a common issue with self-reported instruments, observed in approximately 10% of respondents. The purpose of this study was to develop an Inconsistency Responding Scale (IRS) for the Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Questionnaire (DAPTQ). First, a derivation sample (N = 525) was used to develop the IRS-DAPTQ, a scale generating a total score from the absolute difference of 12 pairs of items with high intra-correlation. Second, the validity of the IRS-DAPTQ was assessed using human (N = 943) and randomly generated (N = 1,000) data. The IRS-DAPTQ successfully differentiated human data from randomly generated data. The IRS-DAPTQ scores showed a negative association with conscientiousness and had higher specificity for a sample of the general population recruited online than for a sample of undergraduate students. These findings support the usefulness of the IRS-DAPTQ for identifying individuals displaying an inconsistent responding style.
Bagby, R. M., & Sellbom, M. (2018). The Validity and Clinical Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 Response Inconsistency Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100 (4), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1420659
Berry, K., Rana, R., Lockwood, A., Fletcher, L., & Pratt, D. (2019). Factors associated with inattentive responding in online survey research. Personality and Individual Diﬀerences, 149 (June), 157–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.043
Bowling, N. A., Huang, J. L., Bragg, C. B., Khazon, S., Liu, M., & Blackmore, C. E. (2016). Who cares and who is careless? insuﬃcient eﬀort responding as a reﬂection of respondent personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000085
Bronchain, J., Chabrol, H., & Raynal, P. (2021). Adaptive psychopathic traits: Positive outcomes in a college student sample. Current Psychology, 40, 4997–5004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144019-00434-3
Bronchain, J., Raynal, P., & Chabrol, H. (2020). Heterogeneity of adaptive features among psychopathy variants. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11 (1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000366
Crowe, M. L., Weiss, B. M., Sleep, C. E., Harris, A. M., Carter, N. T., Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2021). Fearless Dominance/Boldness Is Not Strongly Related to Externalizing Behaviors: An Item Response-Based Analysis. Assessment, 28 (2), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120907959
Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006
Durand, G. (2019a). Incremental Validity of the Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Questionnaire Above Self-Report Psychopathy Measures in Community Samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101 (5), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1464456
Durand, G. (2019b). The adaptive side of psychopathy: Investigating adaptive characteristics associated with the psychopathic personality. Maastricht University.
Durand, G. (2019c). The Durand Adaptive Psychopathic Traits Questionnaire: Development and Validation.
Journal of Personality Assessment, 101 (2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1372443
Huang, J. L., Liu, M., & Bowling, N. A. (2015). Insufﬁcient eﬀort responding: Examining an insidious confound in survey data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100 (3), 828–845. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038510
Kelley, S. E., Edens, J. F., Donnellan, M. B., Ruchensky, J. R., Witt, E. A., & McDermott, B. E. (2016). Development and validation of an inconsistent responding scale for an abbreviated version of the psychopathic personality inventory.
Revised. Personality and Individual Diﬀerences, 91 (March), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.033
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and Preliminary Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Psychopathic Personality Traits in Noncriminal Populations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66 (3), 488–524. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_3
Lilienfeld, S. O., Patrick, C. J., Benning, S. D., Berg, J., Sellbom, M., & Edens, J. F. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clariﬁcations. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3 (3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026987
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. (2005). Psychopathic personality inventory-revised: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2012). An examination of the Psychopathic Personality Inventorys nomological network: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3 (3), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024567
Mowle, E. N., Kelley, S. E., Edens, J. F., Donnellan, M. B., Smith, S. T., Wygant, D. B., & Sellbom, M. (2017). Development of an Inconsistent Responding Scale for the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure. Psychological Assessment, 29 (8), 990–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000395
Patrick, C. (2010). Triarchic psychopathy measure (TriPM). PhenX Toolkit Online Assessment Catalog.